Vertical Data Inc. trades on the OTCQB under VDTA, and on September 11 it announced a definitive purchase agreement to develop an AI data center in central Sweden. The headline figure is arresting: a site where the company intends to pursue an application for up to 100 megawatts of power, in a municipality the release says is connected to as much as 500 MW of available grid capacity. For a stock worth roughly $60 million, that reads like a levered bet on the biggest trade of the decade.
Read the same release a second time and the contraction is the story. What Vertical Data actually agreed to buy — through its majority-owned Swedish subsidiary, Vertical Data Nordic AB — is an existing industrial data center site with 4.5 MW of power capacity today, in Hamre Industrial Park in Sollefteå Municipality. It "intends to pursue" the application that would scale that to 100 MW. Closing, which the company expects in the next several weeks, is subject to financing, corporate approvals, regulatory clearances, and other conditions. Only after closing will it assess site requirements, development costs, customer demand, and financing needs.
That last sentence does more work than it looks like. It means the economics of the project have not been established — the purchase itself has to clear financing and approvals before it closes, and the build-out and the tenant that would fill 100 MW have not been contracted. The 500 MW and the 100 MW are ambitions attached to a grid and a filing intention, not capacity Vertical Data holds. What is signed is a 4.5 MW industrial site.
Quick Backtesting Tool
This is the point where my usual tools stop helping, and honesty about that is the analysis. A factor screen grades valuation, growth, and profitability against a sector peer set; it needs comparable, current numbers. Vertical Data provides almost none that matter yet. For the nine months ended June 30, 2026, it reported revenue of about $872,000 against a net loss of roughly $3.2 million, on roughly 15 million shares outstanding — a company valued near $60 million on well under $1 million of trailing revenue. There is no meaningful valuation multiple to rank, no earnings trajectory to score against the AI-infrastructure complex, and no peer set that makes a pre-revenue microcap comparable to the GPU giants it sits near on a screen. When the data to run the process does not exist, the disciplined answer is to say so rather than invent a grade.
What the numbers do support is the mechanism that actually determines whether this deal becomes value: financing, and the dilution it brings. Vertical Data funds its expansion with equity. In mid-August it closed a private placement of about 1.37 million shares at $3.00, raising roughly $4.12 million for general corporate purposes. It has filed to register 5.3 million shares for resale by selling stockholders — proceeds that do not go to the company. And it is asking stockholders to authorize 10 million blank-check preferred shares, none currently planned, which would give the board a ready instrument to raise more capital or defend control. In other words, every step toward 100 MW likely runs through new shares issued to pay for it. The same dilution that finances the site is the cost of the call option the announcement is really describing.
Put it in portfolio terms. This is not a factor-ranked growth holding and should not be sized like one; it is a small-position optionality sleeve, the kind of concentrated outcome bet where the whole thesis is binary — a site that closes and finds demand, or a pipeline that stays paper. For a reader holding it, the variable that matters is not the next press release's megawatt count but whether a deal that is conditional today converts into a closed, financed, contracted one. Until it does, the gap between 4.5 signed and 100 on paper is the entire investment case — and the financing that closes it is the price the existing shareholders pay.
