Advanced Charting With AI Automation

Confused by candlesticks? With automatic pattern recognition, AIME scans the chart, draws the lines, and tells you straight: bullish or bearish, while revealing the news behind every move.

Discover our new collection of lightweight essenti

Run the Backtest With AI Precision

Turn past reactions into smarter trades today. AIME digs into years of market data, grouping similar events like earnings calls or FOMC meetings, and calculates the results for you — win rates, max gains, and worst-case drawdowns. Want to test a custom strategy? Just ask Aime!

Newswire

Fast, factual, and for you. Your AI-powered real-time news engine.

Live Stream

Stay on pulse with real-time event coverage. From breaking headlines to live market reactions.

Expert Insights

Gain clear insights and fresh ideas from top analysts through deep, actionable market analysis.

Podcasts

Conversations that think — where markets meet discussion.

Market Dashboard

Your All-in-One Hub for Smarter Investing. Stay ahead with World News, Earnings, Macro Insights, and Portfolio Tracking — all in one place. Soon, get AI-powered recommendations tailored just for you!

XRP News Today: Vanguard Shifts Stance on Crypto ETFs, Citing Matured Markets and Demand

Alphabet's AI Ecosystem Fuels Flywheel Growth, Propelling Stock 68% in 2025

Striking Baristas Secure $38.9M in Restitution, But Contract Battles Brew On

Bitcoin News Today: Bitcoin's RSI Signals Cyclical Reset as Market Waits for Fed's Decisive Move

Corporate Strategies Test Balance Between Growth and Sustainability

Community Takes the Wheel as STON.fi Launches TON's First DAO

XRP News Today: XRP's 2026 Make-or-Break: Institutional Hype vs. Real-World Utility

Bitcoin News Today: UK's Crypto Donation Dilemma: Innovation or Risk to Democratic Trust?

UK's Crypto Donation Clash: Democracy vs. Digital Shadows

Ethereum News Today: BitMine's Underwater ETH Bet: High-Stakes Play on 2026 Bull Run

Dogecoin News Today: Dogecoin's Crossroads: Retail Hype vs. Macro and Policy Realities

Bitcoin News Today: Crypto's 2025 Selloff: Liquidity, Not Collapse, as Markets Test New Maturity

Ethereum's Layer-2 Migration and Its Impact on Long-Term Value

Institutional Bitcoin Accumulation and Macro Strategy Positioning: Decoding the Signals for BTC's Near-Term Trajectory

Ethereum News Today: Institutional Buying and Whale Accumulation Fuel ETH Rally Above $3,100

Why XRP is the New Safe Haven for Bitcoin Veterans Amid Regulatory Uncertainty

Crypto Market Rebound: Why Institutional Interest in XRP and Chainlink Signals a Strategic Entry Point

Bitcoin's Long-Term Trajectory: Macroeconomic Tailwinds and Institutional Adoption in 2025

Ethereum's Institutional Takeover: Why Now is the Time to Buy Into the Blockchain's Infrastructure Play

The SEC's Shift and the Rise of Tokenized Securities: A New Era for Institutional and Retail Investors?

Crypto Market Volatility and Institutional Recovery Strategies: Navigating the Storm for Long-Term Gains

Bitcoin Below $90,000: A Strategic Buying Opportunity or a Deeper Downturn?

Why Bitcoin May Break the Four-Year Cycle in 2026

Bitcoin News Today: Bitcoin Rises on Rate Cut Hopes, Eyes $94K Break as ETF Inflows Fuel Bullish Bets

What are the stocks with a P/E ratio lower than the industry average and a dividend yield exceeding 5%?

What investment opportunities or risks do recent news reflect?

Crypto Boom Ignites: Has the Tipping Point Arrived with Strategy soaring nearly 10%?

Which stocks are least likely to drop in a recession?

What is Nvidia's ability in terms of technological innovation?

<video src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/28HA0ZGiQW8" poster="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/ORCLZinPreview_e17c4c411765217710185.jpeg" data="{&quot;videoUrl&quot;:&quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/28HA0ZGiQW8&quot;,&quot;coverUrl&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/ORCLZinPreview_e17c4c411765217710185.jpeg&quot;}"></video>Oracle’s earnings on Wednesday aren’t just another AI print; they’re basically a referendum on whether a $500 billion capex dream, a $455 billion backlog, and a $100 billion debt stack can peacefully coexist on one balance sheet without giving fixed-income desks a nervous breakdown. <a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/countdown-oracle-orcl-q2-earnings-141503290.html" target='__blank'>Analysts expect</a> the headline numbers to look solid. Street models generally line up with management’s guidance for mid-teens revenue growth and another strong quarter of cloud momentum, with total revenue for fiscal Q2 expected to grow roughly 14–16% year-on-year and cloud revenue up in the low-to-mid 30% range. Non-GAAP EPS is expected to land around management’s guide of roughly $1.61–$1.65, with at least one large broker (Jefferies) modeling EPS slightly ahead of consensus. The problem, as CFRA’s Angelo Zino points out, is that “I don’t really think the numbers really matter here this quarter” – the stock will trade on the story around debt, backlog quality, and OpenAI exposure, not a penny or two of EPS.That story starts with the backlog. Oracle’s remaining performance obligations (RPO) exploded to $455 billion in Q1 FY26, up 359% year-on-year and more than tripling in a single quarter, with management signaling that RPO should “exceed $0.5 trillion” as additional mega-deals are signed. A huge chunk of that – around $300 billion – is tied to OpenAI’s multi-year compute commitments. As Zino notes, that implies a “hockey stick type of inflection” that really kicks in beyond FY27, with OpenAI’s ramp meant to drive a 9x increase in OCI run rate by decade-end. In the near term, there is “no concern about the demand trajectory,” but the market is increasingly skeptical that those long-dated commitments will be fully monetized, especially if Gemini’s recent momentum eats into OpenAI’s share.That skepticism is amplified by Oracle’s balance sheet. As of Q1 FY26, Oracle had about $10.4 billion in cash and equivalents and roughly $24.6 billion in total current assets. On the liability side, it carried around $91 billion of notes payable and other borrowings (current plus non-current), total liabilities north of $155 billion, and equity of roughly $24.7 billion – implying net debt of roughly $100 billion and a net debt-to-equity ratio just over 4x.(<a href="https://investor.oracle.com/investor-news/news-details/2025/Oracle-Announces-Fiscal-Year-2026-First-Quarter-Financial-Results/default.aspx" target='__blank'>Oracle Investor Relations</a>) Operating cash flow over the trailing four quarters was about $21.5 billion, but capex has exploded: trailing 12-month capex is running roughly $27.4 billion, leaving trailing free cash flow at about negative $5.9 billion.(<a href="https://investor.oracle.com/investor-news/news-details/2025/Oracle-Announces-Fiscal-Year-2026-First-Quarter-Financial-Results/default.aspx" target='__blank'>Oracle Investor Relations</a>) In plain English: Oracle is deliberately running negative free cash flow to build GPU-rich data centers at unprecedented scale, betting that contracted AI revenue will eventually bail out the balance sheet.Recent financing moves underline that bet. Oracle sold roughly $18 billion of bonds earlier this year, including $3.5 billion of 30-year paper that has since dropped about 8% from its peak as tech credit spreads widened. Project-level financing is also swelling: banks have lined up roughly $38 billion of secured loans to build Oracle-tied AI data centers in Texas and Wisconsin via Vantage Data Centers – the plumbing behind the much-discussed “Stargate” build-out for OpenAI capacity. BNP Paribas estimates Oracle will need “only” an additional $25–30 billion of debt on top of that $18 billion issuance to fund the current build plan, far below the $100 billion-plus worst-case fears swirling in the equity market, but still enough to keep credit desks nervous.You can see that nervousness in CDS. Oracle’s 5-year credit default swaps have roughly doubled in recent months from about 40–55 bps to the 100–110 bps area, implying a risk-neutral five-year default probability in the high-single digits – elevated for Big Tech, but still consistent with investment-grade ratings. Zino’s take is that CDS has become “a macro instrument as a hedge against an AI crash,” rather than a direct signal that Oracle is about to blow through its covenants. But he also expects free cash flow to remain negative for “the next two to three fiscal years,” with annual net outflows of $10–15 billion as capex heads toward $80–90 billion by the late 2020s.That’s why this call is really about narrative management. Zino frames the key ask from investors very simply: can management credibly say, “We’ve raised X amount of debt, we generate Y from operations, and for the next 18–24 months we don’t need to tap the capital markets again”? In his view, that alone could be enough to stabilize sentiment and trigger a relief rally in a stock that’s down roughly a third from its September peak and trading at Microsoft-like multiples despite negative free cash flow and much higher leverage. The flip side is ugly: if Oracle can’t define a clear funding roadmap – including how much will come from vendor financing and capital leases versus straight debt – CDS could widen further and the equity multiple compress again.Investors will also be laser-focused on concentration risk. If the “worst-case scenario” for OpenAI plays out – Gemini cements a durable lead, OpenAI’s revenue trajectory falls well short of the trillion-dollar spend narrative, and some contracted capacity goes unused – Oracle has to prove it can backfill those data centers with other hyperscale and enterprise demand. The company has already talked up large deals with Meta, xAI, and other AI labs, but Zino warns that the Street’s long-term EPS targets “bake in” a very robust OpenAI outcome. Any suggestion that Oracle’s $300 billion OpenAI contribution to RPO is less firm or slower to monetize than implied would hit both the backlog story and the credit story simultaneously.Against that backdrop, here’s what matters most on Wednesday:<ul><li>Bookings and RPO: Not just the headline RPO figure, but the breakdown of how much is tied to OpenAI vs. other AI labs and enterprise customers, and how much is truly “contractually firm” versus contingent on deployment milestones.</li><li>Capex and financing: Updated capex guidance beyond the current ~$35 billion fiscal-year plan, details on the mix of vendor financing, leases, and debt, and any commitment not to re-enter the bond market for a defined period.</li><li>Free cash flow path: A clearer bridge from today’s negative free cash flow to positive territory, including timing, margin assumptions on AI infrastructure, and how quickly new capacity becomes gross-margin and cash-flow accretive.</li><li>Credit and ratings: Management’s stance on preserving investment-grade status, and whether they explicitly address CDS widening and recent downgrades/dovish comments from credit analysts.</li><li>AI demand and competitive positioning: Evidence that AI infrastructure demand remains “insatiable” beyond OpenAI – including Meta, xAI, and other labs – and that Oracle’s differentiated network and database stack can sustain premium economics rather than devolving into a commodity GPU-hosting business.
</li></ul>If Oracle can deliver a quarter that pairs solid numbers with a credible funding and risk-management roadmap, this could mark the point where the stock stops trading as a pure “OpenAI leverage short” and starts trading again as a long-duration AI infrastructure play. If the narrative wobbles, the market may decide that when someone says they’ve “sold 4 million homes to buyers with no income,” it’s time to ask a few more questions before funding the next subdivision.<video src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3jwE4MmOQwY" poster="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode 19_c1774ce41765218810283.jpg" data="{&quot;videoUrl&quot;:&quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/3jwE4MmOQwY&quot;,&quot;coverUrl&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode 19_c1774ce41765218810283.jpg&quot;}"></video>

us_middle_importance

Stock

market

NorthAmerica

Buybacks

Deals-Transaction Volume

Bond

Public Market Buybacks

Deals

US Tech

Cloud Computing

AIGC

甲骨文

科技股[US]

云计算[US]

Oracle’s $500 Billion AI Bet vs. $100 Billion Debt Pile: Earnings Could Make or Break This “Backlog Bubble”

The hard truths about building wealth👇<video src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3jwE4MmOQwY" poster="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/Episode 19_310bd6ca1765202813811.jpg" data="{&quot;videoUrl&quot;:&quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/3jwE4MmOQwY&quot;,&quot;coverUrl&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/Episode 19_310bd6ca1765202813811.jpg&quot;}"></video>Stocks opened to a mixed tone Monday, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average off 36.51 points, or 0.08%, at 47,918.5, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 72.02 points, or 0.31%, to 23,650.2 and the S&amp;P 500 edged up 6.55 points, or 0.10%, to 6,876.95; small caps outperformed, lifting the Russell 2000 1.80 points, or 0.72%, to 252.57. In commodities, U.S. crude oil for January delivery slipped to $59.20, down $0.88, or 1.46%, and February gold futures eased to $4,232.00, off $11.00, or 0.26%. The risk backdrop was more cautious, with the CBOE Volatility Index up 0.86 points, or 5.58%, to 16.27, even as bitcoin climbed to $91,514.13, a gain of $2,548.00, or 2.86%.IBM’s latest move in the AI arms race is <a href="https://www.ainvest.com/news/confluent-soars-ibm-slips-11b-ai-deal-traders-edge-2512/" target='__blank'>an all-cash deal</a> valued at about $11 billion to acquire <a href="https://www.confluent.io/" target='__blank'>Confluent</a>, a real-time data-streaming specialist that sits in the plumbing of modern AI and cloud architectures. Under a definitive agreement, IBM will pay $31 per share in cash for all outstanding Confluent stock, implying roughly a 34% premium to Friday’s $23.14 close and valuing the company at an $11 billion enterprise value. Confluent shares were surging close to 30% in premarket trading, while IBM was down about 1% to 2% as investors weighed the price tag, integration risk and capital-allocation trade-offs.Confluent was founded around Apache Kafka, the open-source standard for “data in motion” that lets enterprises stream, route and process events in real time across applications, clouds and data stores. On top of Kafka, the company has built a full data-streaming platform, cloud and self-managed offerings, governance, stream processing, connectors and newer capabilities like Streaming Agents, to keep data clean and policy-compliant as it flows through increasingly complex hybrid environments. For generative and so-called agentic AI, where software agents are constantly querying and acting, that kind of governed, real-time data fabric is effectively the system’s circulatory network.At the same time, Wall Street is digesting a different kind of AI story: who stands to lose. An equity-strategy report from Wedbush Securities titled “AI Losers: Tech-tonic Shifts Threaten the Status Quo” identifies companies with the highest probability of being left behind in the next phase of AI transformation and coincides with downgrades of Pinterest and Nice from Outperform to Neutral. Wedbush highlights a looming “Memory Squeeze,” arguing that concentrated DRAM and NAND supply and soaring AI infrastructure demand will push DRAM contract prices 30%-plus higher in the fourth quarter of 2025 and lift NAND prices by at least 20%, with further increases expected as hyperscalers lock up capacity. With memory roughly 20% of a PC’s bill of materials, Wedbush estimates that a 27.5% average memory price increase translates into around 5.5 percentage points of added cost of goods sold and 300 to 440 basis points of gross-margin pressure for device makers such as HP Inc. that can’t easily raise prices.<img data-json="{&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/uber_e3f4378c1765203941334.jpeg&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;children&quot;:[{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;&quot;}]}" src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/uber_e3f4378c1765203941334.jpeg" contentEditable="false" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto; maxWidth: 100%" />Wedbush also flags autonomous vehicles as a threat to the ride-sharing model, noting that “full self-driving vehicles built on AI are upon us, with thousands on the road in China and the first Tesla AVs without safety drivers launching in Austin, TX by year end,” and concluding that “this fundamentally weakens the asset-light rideshare model of UBER and LYFT.” In digital advertising, the firm writes that “Agentic AI represents the next phase of digital advertising—where autonomous AI agents make decisions, execute tasks, and optimize spending without manual human intervention,” a shift it says will tilt budgets toward platforms with rich first-party data and measurable conversions and away from discovery-oriented or open-web ad players such as Pinterest and The Trade Desk.Beyond the headline AI trade, some strategists are warning about weaker foundations elsewhere in the market. Torsten Slok, chief economist at Apollo Global Management, recently highlighted that 40% of companies in the Russell 2000 Index have no earnings, according to a chart in Apollo’s “Daily Spark,” using Bloomberg data, underscoring the quality gap between big, profitable benchmarks and more speculative small caps.<img data-json="{&quot;type&quot;:&quot;image&quot;,&quot;src&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/120825_Chart_bce51bb21765204045996.jpg&quot;,&quot;alt&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;children&quot;:[{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;&quot;}]}" src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/120825_Chart_bce51bb21765204045996.jpg" contentEditable="false" style="display: block; margin: 0 auto; maxWidth: 100%" />And on AInvest’s <a href="https://www.ainvest.com/news/ai-investor-wall-street-rebel-michelle-connell-wrong-risk-2512/" target='__blank'>&quot;Capital &amp; Power&quot; podcast</a> Michelle Connell, founder and chief investment officer of Portia Capital Management, argues that investors may be worried about the wrong risks. “What worries me are the private markets, the credit that we&#39;ve talked about earlier,” she tells the host, pointing to signs of “bleeding around the edges” in regions once thought insulated. On AI equities, she adds: “Do I think it&#39;s a bubble? No… but I think you can make more money in other places.”As trading gets under way, the combination of IBM’s big bet on AI infrastructure, Wedbush’s map of potential AI laggards and warnings about unprofitable small caps and stretched private-credit structures offers a reminder that the AI boom is creating as many fault lines as opportunities, both within tech and across the wider market.

us_low_importance

crypto

personal_finance

Alternative Investments

Cryptocurrency

Digital Assets

Europe

Technical Breakouts

Cryptocurrency Exposure

Bitcoin Price Trends

Investing

Price Volatility

Prices

Top Gainers

Futures

Daily Movements

Short-Term Movers

Movers

Bitcoin

Confluent

Stocks Wobble, Bitcoin Blasts Off: Wall Street’s Monday Shock Start

<video src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3jwE4MmOQwY" poster="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode 19_bfd9fc501765201875737.jpg" data="{&quot;videoUrl&quot;:&quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/3jwE4MmOQwY&quot;,&quot;coverUrl&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode 19_bfd9fc501765201875737.jpg&quot;}"></video>IBM’s <a href="https://www.ibm.com/downloads/documents/us-en/1443d5e0094f4011" target='__blank'>latest move</a> in the AI arms race is a big one: an $11 billion all-cash deal to acquire Confluent, the real-time data streaming specialist that sits right in the plumbing of modern AI and cloud architectures. Under the definitive agreement, IBM will pay $31 per share in cash for all outstanding Confluent stock, implying roughly a 34% premium to Friday’s $23.14 close and valuing the company at an $11 billion enterprise value. Confluent shares are responding as you’d expect, surging close to 30% pre-market, while IBM is trading about 1–2% lower as investors digest the price tag, the integration risk, and what it means for capital allocation over the next couple of years.Confluent’s appeal is straightforward if you think in AI infrastructure terms rather than headline models. The company was founded around Apache Kafka, the open-source standard for “data in motion” that allows enterprises to stream, route, and process events in real time across applications, clouds, and data stores. On top of Kafka, Confluent has built a full data streaming platform—Cloud and self-managed offerings, governance, stream processing, connectors, and newer capabilities like Streaming Agents—that helps customers keep data clean, connected, and policy-compliant as it flows through increasingly complex hybrid environments. For generative and “agentic” AI, where software agents are constantly querying, acting, and updating state, that kind of real-time, governed data fabric is effectively the circulatory system. <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2025/12/08/ibm-confluent-deal-data.html" target='__blank'>For IBM</a> , that makes Confluent a tight fit with its hybrid cloud and AI strategy. Management is pitching the deal as creating a “smart data platform for enterprise generative AI,” plugging Confluent’s streaming and event backbone into IBM’s portfolio: Red Hat and hybrid cloud, watsonx and AI infrastructure, automation, and a large consulting organization that already lives inside complex Fortune 500 IT stacks. Confluent brings more than 6,500 customers, including over 40% of the Fortune 500, plus deep integrations with AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Snowflake, Anthropic, and others—very much in line with IBM’s recent push to be partner-friendly rather than closed and proprietary.The deal terms are clean and aggressive. IBM is paying $31 in cash per share, funded with cash on hand, with no stock component and no mention of incremental debt in the announcement. The $31 price represents roughly a 34% premium to Confluent’s last close and a far higher premium to where the stock traded during the recent AI pullback, which helps explain the board’s enthusiasm. IBM says the transaction will be accretive to adjusted EBITDA within the first full year after closing and accretive to free cash flow in year two—standard M&amp;A language, but it signals they believe Confluent’s growth and gross margins can be scaled efficiently inside IBM’s cost structure.There are also some notable protections and incentives baked in. Confluent has agreed that, in certain termination scenarios, it will pay IBM a $453.6 million breakup fee—a sizable reverse termination fee that discourages shopping the company once the ink is dry. On top of that, shareholders representing about 62% of Confluent’s voting power have already entered voting agreements to support the transaction and vote against alternatives, which substantially reduces deal-execution risk from the shareholder side. The remaining hurdles are regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions, with the companies guiding to a closing by mid-2026.Market reaction, as usual, is split between target and acquirer. Confluent is doing what targets do when a large, mostly-cash premium arrives—spiking nearly to the deal price, with arbitrageurs stepping in to capture the spread versus closing risk and time value. IBM, by contrast, is off modestly pre-market, reflecting a cocktail of near-term FCF dilution, integration risk, and skepticism that big legacy tech can fully monetize bleeding-edge infrastructure assets. That said, IBM has been leaning hard into this playbook: the $6.4 billion HashiCorp deal and the earlier Apptio acquisition were also all-cash moves aimed at bolstering cloud, automation, and FinOps capabilities around an AI-centric narrative.Is this the start of a new wave of AI M&amp;A after the latest correction in high-multiple names? It’s certainly another data point in what’s already been a busy year: Alphabet’s $32 billion agreement for Wiz, Palo Alto Networks’ pursuit of CyberArk, Salesforce’s Informatica deal, and now IBM picking up Confluent on the heels of HashiCorp. The pattern is clear: big platforms are shopping not for model companies, but for infrastructure—security, data streaming, observability, cloud control planes—that makes AI reliable and monetizable in the enterprise. With AI infrastructure stocks having pulled back from their peaks while hyperscaler and GPU capex plans remain massive, the valuation gap between “have” balance sheets and “need” specialist assets is widening in a way that naturally invites deals.For investors, the key questions from here are execution and ecosystem impact. Can IBM preserve Confluent’s innovation pace and cloud-neutral posture while deeply integrating it into watsonx, automation, and consulting offerings? Will regulators take a closer look at data-infrastructure consolidation, even though this is nowhere near the scale of the megacap cloud providers? And does this put a takeover premium under other data-streaming and adjacent infrastructure names, or does IBM’s move effectively remove the most obvious target from the board and cool speculation? What’s clear is that IBM just bet $11 billion that, in the AI era, controlling the real-time data rails will be as important as owning the models themselves—and that’s likely to keep the AI M&amp;A rumor mill humming.

Cloud

Big Data

Artificial Intelligence

Confluent Soars, IBM Slips: Inside the $11B AI Deal That Has Traders on Edge

<video src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3jwE4MmOQwY" poster="https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode 19_9cc7b45f1765149023302.jpg" data="{&quot;videoUrl&quot;:&quot;https://www.youtube.com/embed/3jwE4MmOQwY&quot;,&quot;coverUrl&quot;:&quot;https://cdn.ainvest.com/articles/focusnews/coverimage/content/pictures/CandPEpisode 19_9cc7b45f1765149023302.jpg&quot;}"></video>The <a href="https://youtu.be/3jwE4MmOQwY?si=TXdv6GB2kMd99KFl" target='__blank'>latest episode</a> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/embed/3jwE4MmOQwY" target='__blank'></a> of AInvest’s flagship podcast, Capital &amp; Power, features a guest who might just be the most interesting CFA in America — Portia Capital Management’s founder and CIO, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/michellepconnell/" target='__blank'>Michelle Connell</a> . She’s one of the only women in the Dallas–Fort Worth region to own her own registered investment firm, an institutional-grade investor who still teaches finance to college kids, and a private-market insider who evaluates AI deals for a living. She’s also writing a book packed with stories that prove she’s survived every version of Wall Street — from the inspirational to the absurd. In short: this is an episode you don’t want to miss.And yes, she once solved a workplace harassment problem by turning a colleague’s holiday open house into a condom-themed art installation. (“It worked,” she says dryly.) She also once surprised Steve Jobs — or, more accurately, he surprised her — when he strolled into the Pixar IPO meeting in his black turtleneck, pitching the company personally to a room of stunned analysts. Connell was the only one who asked a real question because she was the only one who had actually read the prospectus. These two stories alone justify listening… but the real power of this episode is what Connell says about markets now.Connell’s investing philosophy is what happens when deep institutional experience meets real-world practicality. She still operates in the private markets — including AI, tech, and venture deals — but she applies that same analytical discipline to the portfolios of everyday investors. As she puts it, “Because I can break apart those investments, I can break apart any investment, including publicly traded.” For clients who aren’t eligible for private placements, she builds smart, diversified portfolios using ETFs and active managers who can actually add value. No hype. No shortcuts. Just competence.Her biggest worry heading into 2026? Not the Magnificent Seven. Not Nvidia’s monster run. No — Connell’s radar is aimed at private credit and real estate. “What worries me are the private markets, the credit that we&#39;ve talked about earlier,” she tells host Adam Shapiro, pointing out that she’s already seeing “bleeding around the edges” in areas of the country previously assumed to be insulated. And retirees chasing 12% yields in BDCs? She has one word: leverage — and it’s not a compliment. “At the end of the day, it’s all about cash,” she reminds investors. A simple rule, rarely followed.On the equity side, Connell isn’t calling an AI bubble, but she’s not sugarcoating the narrow leadership either. Even as a longtime semiconductor investor — and someone who owns private AI exposure as well — she thinks many people are blindly chasing the same names without understanding their risk posture. Her take: trim winners, rotate intelligently, and don’t fall in love with a narrative. “Do I think it&#39;s a bubble? No… but I think you can make more money in other places.”One of the episode’s most compelling through-lines is how Connell’s personal history shaped her approach to money. She went from supporting her mother and sister as a teenager — yes, at a McDonald&#39;s that required two bus transfers — to earning an accounting degree, an MBA, and eventually the CFA charter. That perspective fuels her passion for financial literacy and her work with foundations, including one that recently built an 8,000-square-foot youth center. For Connell, markets aren’t an abstract puzzle; they’re a tool that can expand opportunity if used wisely.She’s also refreshingly blunt about AI’s coming disruption. As a private investor in Anthropic, she sides with the people building the technology, not the spectators downplaying it. She expects job displacement, new demands for skilled labor, and a generational shift in what “career” even means. But she also sees enormous growth ahead in biotech, medicine, and industrial innovation. In her view, the next decade will reward investors who pay attention — and punish those who don’t.The episode closes with a warning every 401(k) participant should hear: the push to jam private credit and alternatives into retirement plans could end badly if regulators and fiduciaries don’t get ahead of the risks. “I have a lot of concern there,” she says. And she’s right to. One credit hiccup in a poorly monitored 401(k) sleeve could upend millions of households who never understood what they owned.Funny, sharp, experienced, and unflinchingly honest, Michelle Connell is the rare guest who can make you laugh with a Steve Jobs anecdote and then immediately explain the structural fragilities of private debt markets. That’s what makes this Capital &amp; Power episode so good — and why investors, students, and anyone trying to navigate the AI era should listen.

Investor Calls

Splits

Reaction Analysis

Investor Perception

Conference Calls

Reverse Stock Splits

Earnings

AI Investor, Wall Street Rebel: Michelle Connell Says You’re Looking at the Wrong Risk


The AI chatbot market has entered a pivotal phase in 2025, with Google's Gemini and OpenAI's ChatGPT locked in a high-stakes battle for dominance. While ChatGPT has long held the upper hand in user adoption, recent data reveals a seismic shift in momentum favoring Gemini. This analysis examines the evolving dynamics of user engagement, retention, and strategic innovation to assess why Gemini is emerging as a formidable threat-and a compelling investment opportunity. <h3>User Growth: Gemini's Explosive Trajectory</h3>Gemini's user growth has outpaced ChatGPT's in nearly every metric. As of November 2025, <a href="https://www.thebridgechronicle.com/tech/gemini-outpaces-chatgpt-5x-faster-user-growth-mp99">Gemini's global monthly active users (MAUs) grew by 170% year-over-year</a> and surged 30% quarter-over-quarter, driven by the popularity of its Nano Banana image-generation model. In contrast, ChatGPT's MAU growth slowed to a mere 6% in the same period, <a href="https://www.thebridgechronicle.com/tech/gemini-outpaces-chatgpt-5x-faster-user-growth-mp99">despite maintaining a 55% global MAU share</a>. Sensor Tower data further underscores this divergence: <a href="https://theaiinsider.tech/2025/12/08/sensor-tower-data-shows-gemini-gaining-ground-as-chatgpt-growth-slows/">Gemini users now spend 11 minutes per day in the app</a>, a 120% increase from March 2025, compared to ChatGPT's modest 6% rise. This acceleration has not gone unnoticed. <a href="https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/artificial-intelligence/google-gemini-users-chatgpt-data-10408584/">OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently issued a "code red" directive</a> to prioritize product improvements, signaling growing concern over Gemini's encroachment. Meanwhile, <a href="https://www.thebridgechronicle.com/tech/gemini-outpaces-chatgpt-5x-faster-user-growth-mp99">Gemini's MAU share gained 3 percentage points from May to November 2025</a>, while ChatGPT's share declined by the same margin. <img src="https://cdn.ainvest.com/aigc/hxcmp/images/compress-qwen_generated_1765198285822.jpg.png" style="max-width:100%;"/><h3>Engagement Metrics: Quality Over Quantity</h3>User engagement metrics highlight Gemini's ability to convert growth into sustained interaction. While ChatGPT's average session duration in November 2025 ranged between 7 minutes and 13 minutes and 58 seconds, <a href="https://theaiinsider.tech/2025/12/08/sensor-tower-data-shows-gemini-gaining-ground-as-chatgpt-growth-slows/">Gemini's daily usage of 11 minutes suggests deeper integration</a>. This is particularly significant given that engagement time is a key indicator of platform stickiness. <backtest-component code="GOOGL" id="strategy_001" range="3" market="185"></backtest-component>ChatGPT's engagement remains robust, with <a href="https://www.demandsage.com/chatgpt-statistics/">800 million weekly active users and 2 billion daily queries processed</a> as of December 2025. However, its growth in session duration has plateaued, rising only 6% year-over-year to 6 minutes and 25 seconds in December 2024. <a href="https://elfsight.com/blog/chatgpt-usage-statistics/">Gemini's 120% increase in daily usage</a>, by contrast, reflects a more dynamic user base actively leveraging its multimodal capabilities. <h3>Retention Rates: A Tale of Two Strategies</h3>Retention rates further illustrate the diverging strategies of the two platforms. ChatGPT's subscription tiers demonstrate strong loyalty, particularly among enterprise users. The ChatGPT Plus tier retains 73% of users at the 3-month mark and 64% at 6 months, while the Enterprise tier achieves 95% and 92% retention, respectively. These figures underscore ChatGPT's value proposition for businesses but also reveal a reliance on paid tiers to sustain engagement. Gemini, however, has seen a dramatic improvement in retention. By Q4 2025, <a href="https://x.com/deedydas/status/1985746325993075091">its 3-month retention rate exceeded 90%</a>, up from under 70% in April 2025. This leap is attributed to <a href="https://x.com/deedydas/status/1985746325993075091">the launch of Gemini 2.5 Pro and 1-year free trials for students</a>. Additionally, <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/debarghyadas_geminis-retention-data-is-out-and-it-activity-7391512017091661824-6m6D">Gemini's integration into Google's ecosystem</a>-such as AI mode in Google Search and Google Lens-creates a flywheel effect, driving cross-platform usage and reducing churn. <visualization dataurl="https://cdn.ainvest.com/news/visual/visual_components/viz_olmta02j.json"></visualization><h3>Strategic Implications for Investors</h3>Gemini's rapid growth and retention gains position it as a strategic disruptor in the AI chatbot market. Unlike ChatGPT, which relies on premium subscriptions to monetize its user base, Gemini leverages Google's vast ecosystem to drive organic adoption. This model reduces customer acquisition costs and creates a network effect that could accelerate its dominance. For investors, Gemini represents a high-growth play with several catalysts: 1. Product Innovation: The Nano Banana model and Gemini 2.5 Pro demonstrate Google's commitment to differentiating its AI offerings. 2. Ecosystem Synergy: Integration with Google Search, Lens, and other services ensures sustained user engagement. 3. Market Share Gains: Gemini's 3 percentage point MAU share increase in six months suggests it is capturing users disillusioned with ChatGPT's slowing growth. Conversely, ChatGPT's reliance on paid tiers and its declining MAU share signal potential vulnerabilities. While its enterprise retention is strong, it faces a growing challenge in retaining casual users who are increasingly drawn to Gemini's free, multimodal tools. <h3>Conclusion</h3>The AI chatbot market is at a crossroads. ChatGPT's early lead is being challenged by Gemini's faster growth, superior engagement metrics, and innovative retention strategies. For investors, Gemini's accelerating momentum-backed by concrete data on user growth, session duration, and retention-makes it a compelling high-growth play. As the competition intensifies, the ability to adapt and innovate will determine which platform emerges as the long-term leader.

Volatility Metrics

Long-Term Volatility

Catalysts Analysis

Risk Assessment

Percentage Gains

ChatGPT

Gemini's Accelerating Momentum: A Strategic Threat to ChatGPT and a High-Growth AI Play

Google insider reportedly made more than $1 million in a single day on Polymarket

Paramount offers WBD enterprise value of $108.4 billion

Will China’s Bull Market Extend Into 2026? Smart Money Is Already Positioning

Confluent shares surge almost 30% at open as IBM offers $11 billion acquisition deal

Kosmos Energy Shares Surge 7.48% Pre-Market on Strategic Investor Positioning Amid Energy Sector Rally

Trump: Will be doing a one rule executive order on AI this week

Traders price in 20% chance of ECB rate hike by end of 2026

WVE shares rise 49% pre-market on positive interim Phase 1 data showing obesity drug WVE-007 delivers GLP-1-like fat loss without muscle loss, deemed safe and well tolerated.

Confluent shares halted due to pending news

Netflix shares extend losses to drop 2.7%

Warner Bros. Discovery opens over 6% higher as Paramount proposes cash acquisition at $30 per share.

US stock indices open mixed on Monday; Nasdaq Index up 0.30%; S&P 500 Index up 0.10%; Dow Index down 0.01%

MetaVia shares surge 43.54% intraday after announcing 1:11 reverse stock split to meet Nasdaq requirements and presenting positive phase II trial data for DA-1241 at AASLD conference.

Broadcom Inc. shares rise 4% pre-market, currently trading at $405.90.

Amazon leads $81 million financing for startup Blue Current - WSJ

Is CoreWeave's $50 Support Level a Buying Opportunity or a Warning Sign in the AI Infrastructure Sector?

Polestar's 1-for-30 Reverse Split: A Lifeline or a Temporary Fix for Shareholder Value?

Oracle's Q2 2026: Navigating Earnings Volatility and AI-Driven Growth Catalysts

Capital Market Dynamics Ahead of the FTSE Finish Line: Timing and Positioning for Short-Term Equity Strategies

Global Market Fragmentation and Its Accelerating Impact on Multinational Equities and Emerging Market Exposure

Market Overview for BNB/Tether (BNBUSDT): Strong Bullish Momentum Amid Volatility Expansion

The Vanishing $0.035 Entry Point in Mutuum Finance (MUTM): A Strategic Window for High-Potential DeFi Exposure

Abu Dhabi's Regulatory Breakthrough: How ADGM's Stablecoin Recognition Is Reshaping the Future of Institutional Digital Finance in the Middle East

Crypto Enforcement and Asset Recovery in Cross-Border Cybercrime: How Blockchain Forensics and International Cooperation Are Reshaping Investor Confidence

WMT Options Signal Bullish Momentum: Key Strikes and Trade Setups for Dec 12–19 Expirations

Ainvest Option Flow Daily Digest - 2025-09-19 

Buying Oracle Shares Won't Make You As Rich As Larry Ellison, But Not Doing So Will Surely Leave You With Regret 

Micron’s AI Memory Machine Keeps Humming—But the Tape Wants Even More

UBS Sees Tesla Exceeding 500K Q3 Deliveries, New Record Ahead

David Ellison's Hostile Takeover Bid for WBD: What Recent Moves Mean for Investors

Why Microsoft Outpaces the Magnificent Seven in 2026 Growth Potential

Google's 2026 AI Glasses and the Rise of the Android XR Ecosystem: A Strategic Investment Opportunity in Wearable AI Hardware and Cross-Platform Integration

Harmonic (HLIT): Positioned for 2026 Broadband Growth and Shareholder Value Creation

Affordability as a Political and Economic Catalyst in 2026

Wolters Kluwer's AI-Driven Transformation: A Catalyst for Sustained Outperformance

Latest

Is CoreWeave's $50 Support Level a Buying Opportunity or a Warning Sign in the AI Infrastructure Sector?

Polestar's 1-for-30 Reverse Split: A Lifeline or a Temporary Fix for Shareholder Value?

Oracle's Q2 2026: Navigating Earnings Volatility and AI-Driven Growth Catalysts

Capital Market Dynamics Ahead of the FTSE Finish Line: Timing and Positioning for Short-Term Equity Strategies

Global Market Fragmentation and Its Accelerating Impact on Multinational Equities and Emerging Market Exposure

Market Overview for BNB/Tether (BNBUSDT): Strong Bullish Momentum Amid Volatility Expansion

The Vanishing $0.035 Entry Point in Mutuum Finance (MUTM): A Strategic Window for High-Potential DeFi Exposure

Abu Dhabi's Regulatory Breakthrough: How ADGM's Stablecoin Recognition Is Reshaping the Future of Institutional Digital Finance in the Middle East

Ethereum's Layer-2 Migration and Its Impact on Long-Term Value

Institutional Bitcoin Accumulation and Macro Strategy Positioning: Decoding the Signals for BTC's Near-Term Trajectory

Crypto Enforcement and Asset Recovery in Cross-Border Cybercrime: How Blockchain Forensics and International Cooperation Are Reshaping Investor Confidence

WMT Options Signal Bullish Momentum: Key Strikes and Trade Setups for Dec 12–19 Expirations

US stocks

Trending tickers

Stocks gainers

Stocks losers

Crypto

Trending cryptos

Crypto gainers

Crypto losers