Volkswagen's Leadership Crossroads: Can Schäfer Steer Through Turbulent Waters?

The abrupt departure of Gunnar Kilian from Volkswagen's Group Board of Management marks a pivotal moment for the automaker's governance and strategic execution. With Thomas Schäfer now overseeing Human Resources (HR) on an interim basis, the question arises: How will this leadership reshuffle impact Volkswagen's ability to navigate its ambitious transformation into a sustainable, tech-driven mobility giant?

The stakes are high. Volkswagen faces a triple threat: restructuring its bloated German operations, accelerating its electric vehicle (EV) rollout, and maintaining harmony with powerful labor unions. Schäfer's temporary HR role—unaccompanied by a clear timeline—adds to the uncertainty. While his extended CEO contract until 2030 signals strategic continuity, the governance vacuum left by Kilian's exit could complicate efforts to retain talent, align union interests, and execute cost-cutting plans.

Governance Stability: A Fragile Foundation?
Kilian's exit, attributed to disagreements over managing holding companies, underscores unresolved tensions within Volkswagen's corporate structure. The Group Supervisory Board's swift decision to assign HR duties to Schäfer suggests an attempt to avoid disruption, but the lack of a permanent solution raises concerns.

HR is no minor function at Volkswagen: it is central to managing a workforce of over 660,000 employees, many in Germany, where the “Zukunft Volkswagen” restructuring aims to slash labor costs by €1.5 billion annually. Schäfer's dual role as CEO of Volkswagen Passenger Cars and interim HR chief risks overextension. Can he balance strategic vision with the delicate task of negotiating voluntary retirement schemes (VRS) that will reduce the German workforce by 35,000 by 2030?

The answer hinges on governance cohesion. Schäfer's alignment with Chairman Oliver Blume and the Supervisory Board is critical. Yet, past leadership clashes—including the ouster of former CEO Herbert Diess—highlight the fragility of consensus. Investors should monitor whether Schäfer's interim HR mandate evolves into a permanent role or becomes a recurring point of contention.

Human Capital Risks: A Balancing Act
Volkswagen's success depends on its ability to retain talent in engineering and EV innovation while executing painful workforce cuts. Schäfer's temporary HR leadership introduces uncertainty. Long-serving executives and engineers may question the stability of leadership, risking attrition at a time when expertise is vital.

Union relations, too, are precarious. The IG Metall union has already expressed skepticism about the VRS, warning of “social dumping.” If Schäfer mishandles negotiations, strikes or legal challenges could disrupt production, especially as the company shifts toward EVs. The closure of the Dresden plant by late 2025—a move tied to cost savings—may further strain relations.

VW's share price has lagged peers amid restructuring uncertainty. A resolution of leadership and labor issues could unlock value.

Investors should scrutinize how Volkswagen's “Zukunft Volkswagen” agreement, which includes no layoffs, is implemented. The reliance on voluntary measures—rather than forced cuts—aims to preserve morale, but success requires transparent communication and fair compensation.

EV Strategy: Can Schäfer Pivot Without Stumbling?
Schäfer's vision for Volkswagen Passenger Cars—focused on cost discipline and EV leadership—is clear. He has prioritized slashing development expenses, streamlining models, and targeting affordable EVs like the ID.2all. Yet, execution demands seamless coordination between HR, engineering, and finance.

The interim HR role could complicate this. For instance, realigning technical development teams or retraining staff for EV production requires stable leadership. Delays in these areas would jeopardize the 2030 goal of making Volkswagen the “leading technology manufacturer in sustainable mobility.”

Schäfer's extended CEO contract until 2030 offers some reassurance, but his HR responsibilities remain a potential distraction. A permanent HR leader with deep labor relations expertise could better address union dynamics and talent retention.

Investment Implications: Proceed with Caution
Volkswagen's stock has underperformed peers amid restructuring uncertainty and governance concerns. However, its long-term prospects hinge on executing its EV strategy while maintaining operational stability.

• Bullish Case: Schäfer's dual role proves manageable. Cost savings materialize, unions cooperate, and EVs like the ID.2all gain traction. Volkswagen's scale and brand equity could position it as a sustainable leader.
• Bearish Risks: Leadership infighting, union backlash, or execution delays erode investor confidence. A prolonged interim HR setup could deter institutional investors seeking stable governance.

EV sales momentum is critical. Weak execution could cede ground to rivals.

Recommendation: Investors should adopt a “wait-and-see” stance. Volkswagen's shares offer potential upside if restructuring proceeds smoothly, but governance risks warrant a cautious approach. Short-term traders might consider volatility plays, while long-term investors should await clarity on HR leadership and union agreements.

In conclusion, Volkswagen's fate rests on whether Schäfer can harmonize HR stability with strategic execution. The next 12–18 months will test whether this interim arrangement is a bridge to renewal—or a bridge too far.

—
Note: This analysis assumes no insider information and is for educational purposes. Consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.