WLDS
Wearable Devices·NASDAQ
--
--(--)
--
--(--)
0.74 / 10
Underperform
WLDS exhibits poor fundamentals, scoring only 0.7/10. Key concerns include a negative annualized return on total assets (-139.66%), a high long-term debt to working capital ratio (7.24%), and a low current assets turnover ratio (0.0586). These metrics indicate inefficiency in asset utilization and elevated financial risk, leading to an overall constrained fundamental assessment.
Analysis Checks(0/5)
Net cash flow from operating activities (YoY growth rate %)
Value23.15
Score0/3
Weight24.54%
1M Return-4.17%
Value23.15
Score0/3
Weight24.54%
1M Return-4.17%
Long-term debt to working capital ratio (%)
Value7.24
Score0/3
Weight17.09%
1M Return-3.32%
Value7.24
Score0/3
Weight17.09%
1M Return-3.32%
Net profit / Total profit (%)
Value100.13
Score0/3
Weight36.29%
1M Return-6.99%
Value100.13
Score0/3
Weight36.29%
1M Return-6.99%
Current assets turnover ratio
Value0.06
Score0/3
Weight17.34%
1M Return-3.43%
Value0.06
Score0/3
Weight17.34%
1M Return-3.43%
Annualized return on total assets (%)
Value-139.66
Score1/3
Weight4.75%
1M Return-0.73%
Value-139.66
Score1/3
Weight4.75%
1M Return-0.73%
Net cash flow from operating activities (YoY growth rate %)
Value23.15
Score0/3
Weight24.54%
1M Return-4.17%
Value23.15
Score0/3
Weight24.54%
1M Return-4.17%
Current assets turnover ratio
Value0.06
Score0/3
Weight17.34%
1M Return-3.43%
Value0.06
Score0/3
Weight17.34%
1M Return-3.43%
Long-term debt to working capital ratio (%)
Value7.24
Score0/3
Weight17.09%
1M Return-3.32%
Value7.24
Score0/3
Weight17.09%
1M Return-3.32%
Annualized return on total assets (%)
Value-139.66
Score1/3
Weight4.75%
1M Return-0.73%
Value-139.66
Score1/3
Weight4.75%
1M Return-0.73%
Net profit / Total profit (%)
Value100.13
Score0/3
Weight36.29%
1M Return-6.99%
Value100.13
Score0/3
Weight36.29%
1M Return-6.99%
Is WLDS fundamentally strong?
- WLDS scores 0.74/10 on fundamentals and holds a Premium valuation at present. Backed by its -96.83% ROE, -1749.76% net margin, -1.05 P/E ratio, 2.03 P/B ratio, and 70.75% earnings growth, these metrics solidify its Underperform investment rating.
