The Sledgehammer and the Silence: JPMorgan’s Caution on Tariffs and the Economic Storm Ahead
The U.S. economy is navigating a treacherous crossroads, where trade policy has become both a weapon and a vulnerability. JPMorganJPEM-- analysts, typically among the most vocal voices in financial markets, have begun tempering their public remarks on tariffs—a shift reflecting not only institutional caution but also the gravity of the risks now confronting the global economy.
The Economic Toll: Tariffs as a “Sledgehammer”
JPMorgan’s April 2025 analysis paints a stark picture of tariffs as a blunt instrument with far-reaching consequences. Michael Cembalest, Chair of Market and Investment Strategy, described the administration’s approach as a “kind of sledgehammer, brute force strategy,” while noting self-censorship to avoid institutional repercussions. His April report, Redacted: Straight talk from the CEO front lines on Liberation Day, contained large blacked-out sections, underscoring the constraints on open discourse.
The economic data is equally stark:
- GDP Growth: JPMorgan revised its 2025 U.S. GDP forecast to 1.3%, down from 1.6%, citing tariff-driven inflation and retaliatory measures. A further drag of 0.2% is projected if auto tariffs (25% on vehicles and parts) take full effect, pushing light vehicle prices up by 11.4%.
- Inflation: Tariffs are expected to boost core PCE inflation to 3.1% in 2025, with a 1–1.5% annualized increase in consumer prices. This could push real disposable income into negative territory during Q2 and Q3, eroding consumer purchasing power.
- Recession Risks: Bruce Kasman, JPMorgan’s chief Global Economist, raised the probability of a global recession to 60%, citing tariff-induced sentiment shocks. The IMF estimates tariffs could reduce U.S. GDP by 1% and global GDP by 0.5% by 2026, with half the contraction stemming from confidence declines.
Market Reactions: Volatility and Structural Shifts
Markets have responded with a mix of fear and opportunism. The S&P 500 fell 4.3% in Q1 2025, its worst quarterly performance since 2022, while European equities surged on fiscal stimulus and AI-driven optimism. Treasury yields declined as investors sought safety, with the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield dropping 30 basis points, contrasting with rising European bond yields.
Sector-specific impacts are severe:
- Auto Industry: Ryan Brinkman warned that auto tariffs could force domestic automakers to pass costs to consumers, exacerbating inflation. JPMorgan’s auto sales forecasts were downgraded, anticipating a 0.2% GDP hit.
- Steel and Aluminum: Nora Szentivanyi noted that U.S. reliance on imports means tariffs will sharply raise domestic prices, echoing 2018’s inflationary effects on downstream industries.
The Policy Environment: Silence Amid Chaos
Analysts’ restraint reflects a broader climate of political sensitivity. Cembalest admitted omitting views to avoid “unintended consequences” for JPMorgan, while Feroli highlighted the Fed’s dilemma: holding rates steady risks inflation, but cuts could worsen labor market fragility. The administration’s volatility—such as a 90-day tariff pause excluding China—has done little to stabilize confidence.
Business sentiment has already tanked:
- The U.S. Services PMI fell below 50 in February, signaling contraction.
- The NAHB Housing Market Index dropped to 42, its lowest level in two years.
Conclusion: A Fragile Equilibrium
JPMorgan’s analysis underscores a critical truth: tariffs are not merely a tax issue but a catalyst for structural economic shifts. The $400 billion in tariff revenue (1.3% of GDP)—the largest tax increase since 1968—has transformed trade policy into a fiscal and inflationary time bomb.
Investors face a precarious landscape:
- Equities: U.S. markets remain vulnerable to growth concerns, while Europe benefits from fiscal stimulus.
- Fixed Income: Duration and diversification are critical as recession risks rise.
- Policy: Clarity on trade and fiscal measures is essential to stabilize confidence.
The silence of analysts like Cembalest is a warning. Tariffs have created a “double-edged sword,” stifling growth while inflating prices. Without concessions from trading partners or a reversal of policy, the U.S. economy risks a prolonged period of stagnation—a reality JPMorgan’s data makes impossible to ignore.
The path forward demands more than sledgehammers. It requires precision, cooperation, and a recognition that the global economy cannot afford to be collateral damage in a political storm.

Comentarios
Aún no hay comentarios