XRP: The Undervalued Institutional Infrastructure Play in a Maturing Crypto Market

Generated by AI AgentEvan HultmanReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Friday, Dec 26, 2025 6:38 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

-

emerges as undervalued institutional infrastructure asset, leveraging cross-border payment utility and regulatory clarity post-SEC 2025 settlement.

- Ripple's XRP Ledger outperforms SWIFT with 3-5 second settlements ($0.0002/tx) vs. 2-5 day delays ($10-$50/tx), processing $15B+ in annual cross-border payments.

- Market cap asymmetry highlights potential: $126B XRP vs. SWIFT's $150T annual volume, with 14% capture implying $21T in value, dwarfing FedWire's $1.133T at higher costs.

- Expanding use cases (RLUSD stablecoin, AMM liquidity) and ETF adoption ($941M AUM) position XRP as foundational DeFi layer, with analysts projecting $8 (2026) to $100-$500 (long-term) valuations.

- Risks include SWIFT's network dominance and low active addresses, but XRP's speed, cost advantages, and strategic corridors (e.g., Middle East) mitigate adoption challenges.

In a crypto market increasingly defined by institutional adoption and infrastructure-driven value,

stands out as a compelling yet undervalued asset. While much of the crypto narrative remains fixated on speculative volatility, XRP's trajectory is anchored in real-world utility: cross-border payments, regulatory clarity, and a growing institutional ecosystem. This analysis argues that XRP's current valuation fails to reflect its potential to disrupt traditional financial infrastructure, creating a structural mispricing opportunity for long-term investors.

Regulatory Clarity and Institutional Reawakening

The SEC's 2025 settlement with Ripple marked a watershed moment,

. This resolution eliminated a critical overhang, and reigniting institutional interest. The ripple effect (pun intended) is evident in the approval of spot XRP ETFs by firms like Franklin Templeton and Bitwise, which have within two months. These developments signal a shift from regulatory uncertainty to a framework where XRP can be treated as a legitimate infrastructure asset.

Infrastructure Utility: XRP vs. Legacy Systems

Ripple's XRP Ledger (XRPL) is not merely a blockchain; it is a competitive alternative to SWIFT and FedWire. With settlement speeds of 3–5 seconds and transaction costs of $0.0002,

and $10–$50 per transaction fees. Ripple's On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service has already processed $15 billion in cross-border payments annually, across 55+ countries. By eliminating the need for pre-funded nostro/vostro accounts, ODL -a value proposition that traditional systems struggle to match.

Valuation Metrics: A Tale of Two Systems

Comparing XRP's market capitalization to legacy infrastructure reveals stark asymmetries. As of 2025,

, while SWIFT processes $150 trillion in annual transaction volume . If XRP captures just 14% of SWIFT's volume (as projected by Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse), . At current valuations, this implies a price-to-transaction-volume ratio that is orders of magnitude lower than traditional systems. For context, , yet it operates under a decades-old infrastructure with no comparable scalability or cost efficiency.

Structural Mispricing and Long-Term Compounding

The mispricing is further amplified by XRP's expanding utility beyond payments. Ripple's RLUSD stablecoin, backed by BNY Mellon, has

on XRPL as of December 2025, diversifying the network's use cases into stablecoin corridors. Meanwhile, the XRP Ledger's automated market maker (AMM) amendment (XLS-30) is . These innovations position XRP not just as a payment asset but as a foundational layer for decentralized finance (DeFi) and tokenized assets.

Analysts like Geoffrey Kendrick of Standard Chartered Bank

, driven by ETF demand and corridor adoption. However, the long-term potential is far greater: , the implied valuation could push the asset toward $100–$500, assuming even a fraction of that volume translates to network value.

Risks and Realities

Critics argue that SWIFT's entrenched network of 11,000+ institutions and ISO 20022 migration efforts pose challenges

. Additionally, XRP's active address count remains low compared to peers, and stablecoin alternatives like or centralized solutions could erode adoption. However, these risks are mitigated by XRP's technical advantages (speed, cost, and real-time settlement) and Ripple's strategic expansion into high-cost corridors, .

Conclusion: A Compounding Play on Infrastructure

XRP's undervaluation is not a flaw but an opportunity. Its current market cap fails to account for its role in redefining cross-border payments, its growing institutional custody infrastructure, and its potential to capture a fraction of SWIFT's $150 trillion market. As traditional systems face obsolescence and regulators increasingly accept crypto as infrastructure, XRP's compounding value-driven by transaction volume, liquidity depth, and stablecoin integration-positions it as one of the most compelling long-term plays in a maturing crypto market.