AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
A crypto researcher has refuted claims that
lacks real-world adoption, citing institutional use by major banks and . SMQKE, a crypto analyst, directly challenged investor Fred Krueger’s assertion that “not one actual human being is using XRP,” emphasizing that hundreds of financial institutions—including , , and Santander—have integrated XRP into their operations. The rebuttal was accompanied by a publicly available chart detailing institutional adoption of XRP, highlighting its role as a bridge currency for cross-border payments and settlements via Ripple’s infrastructure [1].The document cited by SMQKE underscores that XRP is not positioned as a retail-facing cryptocurrency but as a utility asset for financial institutions. It notes that hundreds of partners, including the named banks, leverage XRP for real-time gross settlement, currency exchange, and remittance flows. Ripple’s collaboration with entities like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and its commitment to carbon neutrality by 2030 further contextualize XRP’s integration into sustainable financial systems [1].
SMQKE’s response highlights a critical distinction in the crypto sector: the disparity between consumer-facing narratives and institutional applications. While XRP may not appear in everyday transactions, its backend utility for fast, low-cost international transfers has made it appealing to banks and payment providers. This adoption challenges Krueger’s generalization by presenting verifiable data on enterprise-scale usage, reinforcing XRP’s relevance in financial infrastructure rather than consumer markets [1].
The exchange reflects broader dynamics in the crypto ecosystem, where public perception often overlooks the behind-the-scenes role of utility tokens. SMQKE’s emphasis on institutional adoption aligns with Ripple’s strategic focus on enterprise solutions, contrasting with cryptocurrencies like
or , which prioritize retail adoption. By leveraging XRP as a bridge currency, financial institutions address liquidity challenges in cross-border transactions, a use case that remains underreported in mainstream narratives [1].The researcher’s critique also underscores the importance of distinguishing between different cryptocurrency models. XRP’s success in financial infrastructure is tied to its ability to streamline operations for banks, a value proposition that may not align with consumer-centric metrics like transaction volume or retail wallet growth. This distinction complicates broader debates about crypto adoption, as institutional use cases often operate independently of retail adoption trends [1].
By countering Krueger’s claim with documented examples of XRP’s integration into major financial systems, SMQKE has reinforced the token’s practical application in enterprise settings. The analysis highlights a recurring theme in crypto discourse: the need to evaluate utility tokens through the lens of their infrastructure role rather than consumer visibility. As financial institutions continue to adopt blockchain-based solutions, the debate over XRP’s relevance will likely hinge on its ability to meet institutional needs rather than its popularity among individual investors [1].
Source: [1] [title1] [url1]
[1] [title1] [url1]

Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet