AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
In a surprising turn of events, Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have jointly requested the court to revise certain aspects of the penalty and settlement terms in their ongoing legal battle. This move comes as both parties seek an "indicative ruling" from the judge, aiming to modify parts of the final judgment, particularly the relief and penalties.
Ripple has argued that removing the injunction, which prevents them from making similar unregistered sales in the future, would not exempt them from adhering to existing securities laws. They have reiterated their commitment to comply with the law, even without court enforcement. This stance suggests that Ripple is willing to work within the regulatory framework but is seeking more favorable terms in the settlement.
The delay in finalizing the case has sparked speculation within the crypto community about who is responsible for the hold-up. XRP lawyer Bill Morgan has clarified that it is Ripple, not the SEC, that is requesting more time. He noted that the SEC has shown a willingness to cooperate, especially in dissolving the injunction. Former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel added that the charges were brought under previous SEC leadership and that the case is now awaiting a judge's decision, not stalled by the SEC.
Morgan also highlighted that the SEC's recent shift in enforcement strategy has emboldened Ripple to push for better terms. If the judge agrees to
request, a final settlement could be reached within weeks. However, Ripple sees this as an opportunity to aim for a more favorable outcome, given the appeal process.The legal dispute between Ripple and the SEC centers around the classification of XRP, Ripple's native cryptocurrency. The SEC initiated the lawsuit in December 2020, alleging that XRP is a security and that Ripple had sold it without proper registration. This classification, if upheld, could set a precedent for how other digital assets are regulated, with far-reaching implications for the cryptocurrency industry.
In a significant development, both parties have jointly requested the court to pause the appeal process temporarily. This request, part of a status report filed with the Second Circuit Court, indicates a strategic maneuver by both entities to potentially alter the course of the lawsuit. The August 15 deadline mentioned in the filing is merely a procedural deadline for the SEC's status report, not an indication of a final decision. This pause allows both parties to negotiate or present new arguments that could influence the court's decision.
The court's response to this request will be crucial in determining the next steps in the lawsuit. Legal experts have noted that the delay is not due to the SEC, as many in the XRP community have assumed. Instead, it appears to be a strategic move by both Ripple and the SEC to navigate the complex legal landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies. The outcome of this case could provide clarity on the regulatory status of digital assets, with significant implications for the broader cryptocurrency market.
Industry stakeholders, including XRP holders and potential investors, will be closely watching the court's decision on the request to pause the appeal process. The legal battle between Ripple and the SEC has been ongoing for several years, and any developments in the case could have a substantial impact on the future of cryptocurrency regulation. The court's ruling on this request will be a key indicator of how the case is likely to proceed and could potentially lead to a resolution or further delays.

Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet