XRP News Today: Ripple vs SEC Legal Battle Enters New Procedural Phase Amid Ongoing Appeal

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Monday, Aug 4, 2025 6:32 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Ripple's legal battle with the SEC remains unresolved as of August 4, 2025, with active appellate proceedings and no withdrawn cross-appeal from Ripple.

- Former SEC attorney Marc Fagel clarified that SEC's resolution timeline depends on internal approval processes, potentially taking months under standard regulatory protocols.

- Judge Analisa Torres, who ruled XRP not a security in 2023, has no further involvement, confirming the case's transition to appellate/administrative channels.

- Fagel emphasized procedural delays rather than political motives, urging investors to focus on formal legal pathways over speculative timelines.

The ongoing legal dispute between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) remains unresolved as of August 4, 2025, with recent public dialogue highlighting key procedural developments [1]. A prominent XRP supporter engaged in a public exchange with former SEC attorney Marc Fagel, who provided clarity on the status of the case, particularly Ripple’s countersuit, the role of former SEC officials, and the involvement of Judge Analisa Torres.

Fagel clarified that Ripple has not yet withdrawn its cross-appeal, indicating that the appellate process is still active [1]. He emphasized that the resolution of the SEC’s side of the case is subject to internal approval procedures, which may require several months under standard regulatory requirements [1]. His comments suggest that any perceived delays are procedural rather than intentional.

Another point of discussion was the potential role of Judge Analisa Torres, who in July 2023 issued a landmark ruling that XRP was not a security when sold programmatically to the general public [1]. Fagel explicitly stated that Judge Torres no longer has any involvement in the case, signaling that the dispute has moved beyond her jurisdiction and into appellate or administrative channels [1].

The dialogue also touched on broader implications, with some speculating that the SEC’s timeline for resolution could align with national economic strategies. However, Fagel limited his remarks to the procedural aspects of the case, avoiding political commentary [1].

As the legal process continues, investors are reminded that regulatory conclusions are governed by formal legal pathways rather than public speculation or political timelines. The final outcome of the case remains dependent on the appellate process and administrative actions.

Source: [1] Ripple (XRP) vs SEC Case Update As of August 4, 2025 (https://timestabloid.com/ripple-xrp-vs-sec-case-update-as-of-august-4-2025/)

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet