AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Ripple’s ongoing legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken a significant turn following a federal court’s decision to reject the company’s request to ease penalties. Judge Analisa Torres denied Ripple’s motion to vacate the current injunction and reduce the fine to $50 million. This ruling has intensified speculation about the future of Ripple’s substantial XRP escrow holdings, which are estimated to be approximately 37 billion XRP. These escrowed assets were established in 2017 to ensure a steady release of tokens, with one billion tokens becoming available annually and any unused quantity being returned to escrow.
Brad Kimes, founder of XRPLasVegas, suggested that the U.S. government could potentially take over Ripple’s escrowed XRP assets following the court’s ruling. This speculation arises from the legal pressure
is currently under, which raises questions about the control and management of the locked tokens. While Ripple does not have direct access to these funds, the debate among blockchain specialists centers on whether the absence of direct access constitutes a complete loss of control. Daniel Keller, Chief Technology Officer of Eminence, argued that Ripple continues to benefit from the issued tokens, asserting that placing possessions in escrow does not negate ownership and responsibility. Conversely, XRPL developer Mayukha Vadari emphasized that Ripple cannot spend or access the funds until the protocol’s conditions are met, highlighting the independent functioning of the system and limiting Ripple’s role from a technical standpoint.Amid the growing debate, a known XRPL validator proposed that the U.S. government could assume control over Ripple’s escrow by reassigning the account’s regular key to a federal address. This process, according to the validator, would be straightforward and would transfer full authority over the locked funds to the government. Kimes also noted that such a move could be driven by national interest, as digital assets become a focal point in financial policy. He suggested that the government could classify XRP in escrow as a strategic asset and use it to promote digital currency at the national level. With the legal issue still unresolved, the concept of a federal takeover of the escrow is gaining traction within the XRP community. The court’s latest decision has intensified these conversations, adding new pressure on Ripple while opening the door to potential government involvement in its token management.
Ripple’s legal challenges are deepening, and its XRP escrow has become a central issue in the broader regulatory landscape. As new voices call for federal control and speculation mounts, the coming weeks could be pivotal for both Ripple and the future of XRP. The court’s decision to deny Ripple’s motion to dismiss the SEC’s claims is a significant setback for the company. However, the legal battle is far from over, with both parties expected to continue their arguments in court. The ultimate decision on whether XRP is a security or not will have profound implications for the future of the cryptocurrency market. The potential seizure of Ripple’s XRP escrow could disrupt financial services that rely on XRP for cross-border payments and remittances, potentially harming the reputation of the cryptocurrency industry as a whole. Additionally, the ruling could set a precedent for future regulatory actions against other cryptocurrencies and their issuers, shaping the regulatory landscape for digital assets.

Quickly understand the history and background of various well-known coins

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025

Dec.02 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet