Workday Slips 1.45% on Weak Guidance Despite 22% Revenue Growth Ranks 159th in 600M Trading Volume

On September 12, 2025, , ranking 159th in market activity. The stock’s performance reflected mixed signals from earnings-related developments and broader market sentiment shifts.

Recent updates highlighted Workday’s Q2 revenue guidance, . The company attributed the softer outlook to delayed enterprise software adoption cycles in key sectors. Meanwhile, , signaling management’s confidence in undervaluation but failing to offset immediate profit-taking pressures.

Market analysts noted the stock’s sensitivity to macroeconomic uncertainty, as rising bond yields pressured growth-oriented tech equities. Workday’s valuation multiples, , remain elevated compared to peers like SAP and Oracle, creating technical resistance near critical moving averages. , suggesting potential volatility ahead.

To run this back-test accurately I need to pin down a few practical details and verify that the scope matches what our current single-ticker back-test engine can handle. Universe: Should we include every U.S. common stock listed on NYSE + Nasdaq, or a different universe (e.g., only S&P 500 constituents)? Entry/exit prices: Typical implementations buy at today’s close and exit at tomorrow’s close (close-to-close), but we can also model buy at today’s close → sell at tomorrow’s open. Which do you prefer? Transaction costs / slippage: Do you want to include an estimate (e.g., ? Portfolio accounting: Our built-in back-test engine evaluates one ticker at a time. If you simply want to see how this volume screen performs on a single symbol (e.g., SPY) we can proceed immediately. If you would like the full cross-sectional portfolio return (equal-weight or value-weight across 500 names per day), we will need to construct a custom aggregation layer, which will take a bit more setup. Let me know your preferences on the above so I can build the correct data-retrieval and back-testing workflow.