Web3 Gaming Fails to Capture Mainstream Players Despite Billions in Investment

In 2024, the gaming industry faced significant challenges, with layoffs and studio closures affecting even the most prominent players. The decline in gaming, which began after the end of COVID-19 lockdowns, was exacerbated by unsustainable development costs and an innovation crisis. Web3 gaming emerged as a potential solution, promising to return power to developers and raising billions of dollars in investment. However, despite the rise in crypto adoption, Web3 gaming has failed to capture mainstream players’ attention or solve any of gaming’s fundamental problems. Early blockchains were designed for financial applications, forcing game developers to either build on blockchains not suited for their use or create their own chains, isolating themselves from the broader blockchain ecosystem. This resulted in poor player experiences and an overemphasis on tokenomics, creating walled gardens similar to those in traditional gaming.
Traditional gaming development is costly, often exceeding $100 million per title, making it difficult for indie developers to compete against large publishers who control funding and distribution. Blockchain seemed to offer a solution by providing new avenues for indie studios to raise funds and control distribution. However, early Web3 gaming platforms recreated the same enclosed systems that blockchain aimed to fix, with high player acquisition costs and limited Web3 gamers. This led to the development of its own set of problems, including the technological infrastructures of layer-1 blockchains like Ethereum and Solana, which were not aligned with gaming’s requirements. Game developers, attracted to Web3’s funding model and promises of ownership and user engagement, were forced to either build on existing blockchains and compromise gameplay or launch their own chain, diverting attention and resources away from game development.
While crypto-native players may find this tradeoff worthwhile, mainstream gamers seek engaging experiences. A January report showed that Web3 gaming had reached 7.3 million unique active wallets, but only a small fraction of these represented actual gamers. The misalignment with gaming culture is evident as Web3 games often focus on crypto technology and tokenomics rather than fun and engaging gameplay. This has led to a situation where success in Web3 gaming meant taking crypto users from each other rather than bringing new players onchain. The industry has lost sight of what’s important: making fun games that people want to play. This misalignment also extends to game developers who want to enter Web3 to create better player experiences and sustainable revenue models but are hesitant due to the complex systems and technical skills required.
As major studios continue to struggle, Web3 has a second chance to deliver on its promise. This time, the focus must be on creating access for creators and players instead of building new walled gardens. This requires Web3 gaming-specific infrastructure that provides both developer control and cross-ecosystem collaboration. The path forward involves restoring economic freedom to creators and putting control back in players’ hands. This means revenue models that reward collaboration instead of isolation and returning to gaming’s roots—making games fun again. The future of gaming is not about better graphics or token incentives but about creating an industry where creativity and collaboration can thrive. When developers can focus on making engaging experiences instead of building moats, everyone wins.

Comments
No comments yet