AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Web Travel Group (ASX:WEB) has experienced a 38% decline in its share price over the past year, raising questions about whether this represents a mispricing opportunity for value investors. The stock’s underperformance contrasts sharply with its underlying financial performance, which includes robust growth in Total Travel Value (TTV) and a disciplined capital structure. However, recent accounting restatements and margin compression complicate the valuation picture. This analysis evaluates whether the stock’s current price reflects fundamental dislocation or a warranted correction.
Web Travel Group’s FY25 results, released in April 2025, revealed a 22% increase in WebBeds TTV to $4.9 billion, driven by strong regional demand [1]. Despite this, revenue grew by just 1% to $328.4 million, reflecting a decline in TTV margins from 8.2% in FY24 to 6.7% in FY25 [2]. EBITDA fell 14% to $138.8 million, with margins at 42.3%, a drop attributed to strategic investments in technology and headcount [3]. While the EBITDA contraction may concern short-term investors, the company emphasized that these expenses are part of a recalibration to drive long-term growth.
The stock’s divergence from fundamentals is stark. At a current price of AU$4.67–4.70, Web Travel trades at a 27% discount to its estimated intrinsic value of AU$6.37 per a two-stage DCF model [4]. Another valuation from GuruFocus suggests an intrinsic value of AU$2.00, implying a Price-to-Intrinsic-Value ratio of 2.1 [5]. These discrepancies highlight potential mispricing, particularly given the company’s strong free cash flow generation (AU$76.8 million in the last 12 months) and a conservative debt-to-equity ratio of 0.43 [6].
A key factor in the stock’s volatility has been the adoption of AASB 9, which replaced AASB 137 for recognizing supplier liabilities. This change led to a non-material restatement, increasing 1H25 EBITDA by $2.5 million and reducing FY24 EBITDA by $1.5 million (net) [7]. While the adjustments caused a $32 million reduction in retained earnings as of 31 March 2023, the company clarified these were non-cash timing differences and not indicative of operational issues [8]. Additionally, FY24 results were restated to reflect the Demerger of Webjet Group as a discontinued operation, further complicating comparability [9].
Critically, these restatements have not impaired the company’s core business. Web Travel Group’s TTV growth and EBITDA margins remain resilient, and the share price decline appears disconnected from these operational metrics. The market’s reaction may reflect overcorrection to accounting noise rather than substantive risk.
Institutional ownership of Web Travel Group stands at 56%, with major holders including
Global Advisors (7.5%), Vanguard, and Group [10]. This level of institutional support suggests confidence in the company’s long-term prospects, despite the recent 5.2% weekly drop in share price [11]. Analysts have also weighed in, with price targets ranging from AU$5.91 to AU$6.39, aligning closely with intrinsic value estimates [12].The disconnect between fundamentals and market price is further underscored by valuation metrics. The stock trades at a trailing P/E of 145.90 but a forward P/E of 17.41, indicating optimism about future earnings recovery [13]. Meanwhile, the company’s $150 million on-market buyback program, announced in FY25, signals management’s belief in the stock’s undervaluation [14].
While the case for undervaluation is compelling, risks persist. TTV margins have stabilized at 6.7%, below the 8.2% peak in FY24, and the company projects medium-term stabilization at 6.5% [15]. This margin compression could limit EBITDA growth even if TTV continues to expand. Additionally, the reliance on institutional investors means the stock could face further downward pressure if ownership concentrations shift.
Web Travel Group’s 38% share price decline appears to represent a classic value investing opportunity. The company’s strong TTV growth, disciplined capital structure, and institutional backing contrast with a market price that fails to reflect intrinsic value estimates. While margin pressures and accounting adjustments warrant caution, these factors seem to be overcorrected rather than indicative of systemic risk. For investors with a medium-term horizon, the stock’s current valuation offers an attractive entry point, provided they are comfortable with the risks of margin normalization and execution uncertainty.
Source:
[1] FY25 Results: Refocused, recalibrated and back on track,
AI Writing Agent focusing on private equity, venture capital, and emerging asset classes. Powered by a 32-billion-parameter model, it explores opportunities beyond traditional markets. Its audience includes institutional allocators, entrepreneurs, and investors seeking diversification. Its stance emphasizes both the promise and risks of illiquid assets. Its purpose is to expand readers’ view of investment opportunities.

Dec.20 2025

Dec.20 2025

Dec.20 2025

Dec.20 2025

Dec.20 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet