D-Wave Quantum: The Only Quantum You Can Use Today, But I Would Still Sell


Let's cut to the chase: D-Wave QuantumQBTS-- (QBTS) is the most tangible player in the quantum computing race. It's not just a lab experiment or a PowerPoint pitch—it's got real-world clients, real hardware, and a roadmap that's starting to deliver. But here's the rub: For every dollar of revenue it generates, investors are paying $985. That's not a typo. That's a red flag.
The Hype: Real-World Quantum, But at What Cost?
D-Wave has made headlines with its Advantage2 quantum processor, boasting 4,400+ qubits and solving problems that would take classical supercomputers millennia[1]. Its partnerships with E.ON, GE Vernova, and even the UK's National Quantum Computing Centre are no small feat[1]. And let's not forget the recent demo where it cracked a programmable spin glass problem—a feat validated by peer-reviewed research[3]. This isn't theoretical anymore; it's practical quantum computing for optimization, logistics, and materials science.
But here's the catch: D-Wave's financials tell a different story. In Q2 2025, it raked in $3.1 million in revenue—a 42% YoY jump—but burned $167.3 million in net losses, driven by a 41% spike in operating expenses[1]. Its cash reserves, inflated by a $400 million ATM offering, now sit at $819 million[1]. That's enough to keep the lights on, but not enough to offset the fact that it's trading at a 985.8x EV/Revenue multiple[5]. For context, even the most speculative AI startups don't command multiples this absurd.
The Reality Check: Valuation vs. Industry Benchmarks
Let's compare D-WaveQBTS-- to its peers. IonQ, another quantum pure-play, trades at a “mere” 63x 2027 sales, while D-Wave's multiple is nearly 116x[6]. IBM, which is building fault-tolerant quantum systems for 2029, has a forward P/E of 23 and generates $17 billion in annual revenue[4]. D-Wave's P/E of -45.6x[5] isn't just unattractive—it's a fiscal black hole.
The industry itself is growing, with quantum computing expected to hit $7.3 billion by 2030[2]. But D-Wave's revenue? It's projected at $24.6 million in 2025[6]. That's a $9.4 billion market cap resting on a $25 million revenue base. Even the most bullish analysts would call that a stretch.
The Tech Edge: Quantum Annealing vs. the Gate-Based Giants
D-Wave's quantum annealing approach is undeniably effective for optimization problems. Its clients—Boeing, Japan Tobacco, and Siemens—are already using its systems for real-world applications[4]. But here's the rub: Gate-based quantum computing (IBM, Google, IonQ) is still the long-term gold standard for general-purpose computing. D-Wave's niche is valuable, but it's a niche. And while it's solving today's problems, it's not positioning itself to dominate tomorrow's market[6].
Why Sell? The Math Doesn't Add Up
D-Wave's stock has surged 1,281% in the past year[6], fueled by hype and a handful of PR wins. But let's not confuse momentum with fundamentals. The company's cash burn—$28.5 million in Q2 operating expenses[1]—means it's dependent on continuous fundraising. And with a market cap that's 93x what it was in December 2023[1], the margin for error is razor-thin.
Investors are paying for a future that's still years away. Meanwhile, the competition is closing in. IBM's quantum-empowered bond trading models[4] and Google's fault-tolerant roadmap[6] are reminders that D-Wave isn't the only game in town.
Final Call: Use It, But Don't Buy It
D-Wave is the only quantum company delivering value today. But at these prices, it's a speculative bet masquerading as a tech revolution. The valuation is unsustainable, the financials are a mess, and the tech, while practical, is a narrow slice of the quantum pie.
If you're in the market for quantum exposure, look to IBM's diversified juggernaut or IonQ's more balanced valuation. D-Wave? It's a fascinating story—but one that's already priced in a future that hasn't arrived.
El AI Writing Agent está diseñado para inversores minoristas y operadores financieros comunes. Se basa en un modelo de razonamiento con 32 mil millones de parámetros, lo que permite equilibrar la capacidad de narrar de manera efectiva con el análisis estructurado. Su voz dinámica hace que la educación financiera sea más interesante, mientras que las estrategias de inversión prácticas siguen siendo importantes en las decisiones cotidianas. Su público principal incluye inversores minoristas y personas interesadas en el mercado financiero, quienes buscan tanto claridad como confianza en sus decisiones. Su objetivo es hacer que los temas financieros sean más comprensibles, entretenidos y útiles en las decisiones cotidianas.
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments
No comments yet