Vistra shares surge 5.26% premarket on Goldman Sachs upgrade and Meta nuclear energy deals.
ByAinvest
Friday, Feb 6, 2026 8:42 am ET1min read
VST--
Vistra (NYSE:VST) surged 5.26% in premarket trading, driven by a strategic partnership with Meta Platforms to develop a nuclear energy pipeline and upgraded analyst ratings. The company is part of Meta’s initiative to secure 6.6 GW of nuclear power, extending the life of existing plants to meet AI-driven data center demands, creating a multi-year revenue opportunity. Goldman Sachs upgraded VST to Buy from Neutral with a $205 price target, while UBS maintained a Buy rating with a $233 target. Analyst optimism, coupled with above-average trading volume and momentum, amplified the move. Although insiders sold $29 million in shares over the past year, the Meta deal and analyst upgrades overshadowed those concerns, positioning Vistra as a beneficiary of long-term energy infrastructure demand.
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.
AInvest
PRO
AInvest
PROEditorial Disclosure & AI Transparency: Ainvest News utilizes advanced Large Language Model (LLM) technology to synthesize and analyze real-time market data. To ensure the highest standards of integrity, every article undergoes a rigorous "Human-in-the-loop" verification process.
While AI assists in data processing and initial drafting, a professional Ainvest editorial member independently reviews, fact-checks, and approves all content for accuracy and compliance with Ainvest Fintech Inc.’s editorial standards. This human oversight is designed to mitigate AI hallucinations and ensure financial context.
Investment Warning: This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment, legal, or financial advice. Markets involve inherent risks. Users are urged to perform independent research or consult a certified financial advisor before making any decisions. Ainvest Fintech Inc. disclaims all liability for actions taken based on this information. Found an error?Report an Issue

Comments
No comments yet