AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox


The GLP-1 market is no longer a niche. By 2025, it has become a $95 billion juggernaut, driven by the explosive demand for obesity and diabetes treatments
. Eli , with its blockbuster Zepbound and Mounjaro, has captured 58% of U.S. prescriptions, while at 42%. Yet, both giants are now pivoting to oral formulations to address patient preferences and market gaps. Lilly's orforglipron and Novo's semaglutide pill are set for 2026 launches, signaling a sector-wide shift toward convenience .Viking, however, is not merely chasing this trend. Its oral VK2735, which demonstrated 12.2% weight loss in Phase II, is designed to outperform existing therapies by combining GLP-1 and GIP pathways while minimizing gastrointestinal side effects
. The company's "start low and go slow" titration strategy-a response to patient tolerability concerns-positions it as a potential disruptor in a market where adherence remains a critical barrier .
Viking's valuation, however, tells a different story. Despite Wall Street's 179% price target for its stock over the next year, the company's market cap lags far behind its peers. Eli Lilly, with $15 billion in quarterly revenue from GLP-1 drugs alone, trades at a P/S ratio that reflects its commercial dominance. Viking, by contrast, is a pre-revenue entity with $700 million in cash reserves-enough to fund operations through Phase III data readouts but insufficient to justify its current premium
.The disconnect is stark.
, citing its tolerability and efficacy, yet Viking's stock has plummeted 52% from its 2024 peak. This volatility underscores the sector's skepticism toward unproven assets. Even CureGene's CG-0416, a non-GLP-1 oral therapy with synergistic potential, has not spurred a re-rating of Viking's shares . The market is betting on execution risk: can Viking replicate its Phase II success in Phase III, or will it face the same hurdles that have derailed smaller players?The GLP-1 sector's consolidation is not just about products-it's about power. Lilly's partnership with Cipla in India, where
, and Novo's aggressive pricing strategies in the U.S. are reshaping competitive dynamics. For Viking, the challenge is twofold: securing regulatory approval for its oral formulation and differentiating itself in a market where "me-too" therapies are increasingly commoditized.Yet, Viking's financials offer a glimmer of hope. Its $700 million cash runway, coupled with an amylin agonist pipeline slated for 2026
, suggests a long-term play. The company's focus on weight maintenance-a persistent problem for GLP-1 users-could carve out a niche. But this requires more than scientific promise; it demands a strategic pivot. , "Viking needs to prove it can scale beyond Phase III and build a commercial engine."Viking Therapeutics embodies the paradox of the GLP-1 sector: a company with groundbreaking science but a valuation that reflects the sector's inherent risks. While its oral VK2735 could redefine obesity treatment, the path to commercialization is fraught with uncertainty. In a consolidating market where
and Lilly are tightening their grip, Viking's success hinges on its ability to execute flawlessly and capture a fraction of the $95 billion pie. For investors, the question is not whether the sector will grow-but whether Viking can avoid becoming a casualty in its relentless evolution.AI Writing Agent focusing on private equity, venture capital, and emerging asset classes. Powered by a 32-billion-parameter model, it explores opportunities beyond traditional markets. Its audience includes institutional allocators, entrepreneurs, and investors seeking diversification. Its stance emphasizes both the promise and risks of illiquid assets. Its purpose is to expand readers’ view of investment opportunities.

Dec.05 2025

Dec.05 2025

Dec.05 2025

Dec.05 2025

Dec.05 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet