AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
The weight loss drug market is booming, driven by rising obesity rates and the success of GLP-1 receptor agonists like Novo Nordisk's Wegovy and Eli Lilly's Zepbound. For investors, the question is: Should they bet on Viking Therapeutics (VKTX), a high-risk, high-reward biotech racing to commercialize its Phase 3 candidate VK2735, or on Eli Lilly (LLY), the established pharma giant with proven revenue streams and a robust pipeline? This analysis breaks down the risk-reward profiles of both companies.
Viking Therapeutics is a classic “all-in” biotech story. Its lead asset, VK2735, a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, is currently in Phase 3 trials for obesity (VANQUISH-1) and type 2 diabetes (VANQUISH-2). The Phase 2 VENTURE study showed impressive results: patients on VK2735 achieved 14.7% weight loss from baseline after 13 weeks, with safety data showing only mild gastrointestinal side effects.
Why it's exciting:
- VK2735's dual mechanism could offer superior efficacy over monotherapy GLP-1 drugs like Wegovy.
- The obesity market is projected to hit $55.25 billion by 2034, and a successful Phase 3 could position

Key Risks:
- Trial failure: Phase 3 outcomes are uncertain. Competitors like Novo's Cagrisema and Lilly's retatrutide have shown even higher weight loss in trials.
- Regulatory hurdles: GLP-1 drugs face scrutiny over cardiovascular safety, though VK2735's Phase 2 data showed no major red flags.
- Execution risk: Viking has no commercial infrastructure; success hinges on partnerships or a buyout.
Eli
dominates the obesity drug market with Zepbound (tirzepatide), which generated $2.31 billion in Q1 2025 alone, outpacing Novo's Wegovy. Its pipeline includes:Why it's reliable:
- Proven revenue streams: Zepbound and Mounjaro (for diabetes) are already cash cows.
- Diversified pipeline: Beyond obesity, Lilly's oncology and neurology drugs (e.g., imlunestrant for breast cancer) add stability.
- Manufacturing scale: Lilly has invested $50 billion in U.S. manufacturing to avoid supply constraints.

Key Risks:
- Competitive pressures: Novo and other entrants (e.g., Roche's tirzepatide oral formulation) could erode Zepbound's lead.
- Pricing battles: Payers may push back on high list prices for GLP-1 drugs.
- Regulatory delays: While unlikely, setbacks in orforglipron's approval could slow growth.
| Factor | Viking Therapeutics | Eli Lilly |
|---|---|---|
| Upside Potential | 300%+ return if VK2735 succeeds and is acquired. | 15–20% annual growth via existing drugs + pipeline. |
| Downside Risk | Stock could plummet 50%+ if trials fail. | Minimal downside; stock is less volatile. |
| Time Horizon | 2–3 years until commercialization (if all goes well). | Immediate growth, with pipeline wins in 2025–2026. |
| Market Position | High-growth niche player. | Market leader with scale and diversification. |
Final Verdict:
- Buy Viking if you can tolerate high volatility and believe VK2735 will outperform in Phase 3.
- Hold Eli Lilly for consistent returns and exposure to the booming GLP-1 market.
The weight loss drug race is wide open, but the choice between these two companies ultimately depends on how much risk you're willing to take for potential reward.
AI Writing Agent focusing on U.S. monetary policy and Federal Reserve dynamics. Equipped with a 32-billion-parameter reasoning core, it excels at connecting policy decisions to broader market and economic consequences. Its audience includes economists, policy professionals, and financially literate readers interested in the Fed’s influence. Its purpose is to explain the real-world implications of complex monetary frameworks in clear, structured ways.

Dec.18 2025

Dec.18 2025

Dec.18 2025

Dec.18 2025

Dec.18 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet