VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) Hits a New 52-Week High Driven by Strong Institutional Demand Amid $27.7 Million in Net Capital Flows on January 13, 2026.

ETF Overview and Capital Flows

VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM.O) tracks a multi-factor-selected, volatility-weighted index of stocks from developed economies outside the U.S. The fund focuses on equity exposure through a long-only, non-leveraged structure. Recent capital flows show strong institutional demand: on January 13, 2026, it absorbed $27.7 million in net fund flows, driven by $21.97 million in extra-large orders and $22.89 million in block trades. This contrasts with its 0.35% expense ratio, which sits above the average for passive equity ETFs.

Technical Signals and Market Setup

UIVM.O hit a 52-week high amid a technical overbought condition. Its Relative Strength Index (RSI) crossed into overbought territory on January 15, 2026, signaling potential near-term exhaustion for buyers. Still, the price action suggests sustained momentum, with volatility-weighted positioning amplifying short-term gains. In practice, this setup often precedes consolidation phases but reinforces the ETF’s role in a rising trend.

Peer ETF Snapshot

• AGGH.P charges 0.3% expense ratio with $321M assets under management (AUM).
• APMU.P has 0.37% expense ratio and $207M AUM.
• AVIG.P offers the lowest expense ratio at 0.15% but commands $2B AUM.
• AGG.P, the largest peer, holds $137B AUM with just 0.03% expense ratio.

Opportunities and Structural Constraints

UIVM.O’s recent strength highlights its appeal in a global equity rally, particularly for investors seeking non-U.S. developed markets. The overbought RSI signals caution for near-term traders but underscores underlying demand. Structural constraints include its 0.35% expense ratio, which lags behind peers like AGG.P, and its niche focus on volatility-weighted stocks, which may limit broader adoption. At the end of the day, the ETF balances specialized exposure with moderate costs, making it a viable but not universal choice for international equity bets.