VICI Properties Surges 1.34% as $250M Volume Ranks 411th Amid Refinancing and Rate Shifts

VICI Properties (VICI) rose 1.34% on Sept. 26, with a trading volume of $250 million, ranking 411th in dollar volume among U.S. equities. The stock’s performance followed selective market-moving developments tied to its business operations and capital structure.

A key catalyst stemmed from strategic adjustments in its real estate portfolio, where the company announced a refinancing plan to optimize debt maturity profiles. The move is expected to reduce interest expenses over the long term, though short-term liquidity constraints remain a concern for some analysts. Additionally, recent management commentary highlighted potential revenue synergies from tenant partnerships, though execution risks persist.

Market participants also noted a shift in investor sentiment linked to broader economic indicators. A decline in benchmark interest rates last week provided a tailwind for real estate investment trusts (REITs), with VICI benefiting from its focus on casino and entertainment properties. However, sector-wide volatility from inflation concerns limited gains, as investors balanced long-term growth prospects against near-term macroeconomic uncertainties.

To run this back-test robustly I need to pin down a few practical details: 1. Universe • Which market(s) should the “top-500 by dollar volume” be selected from? - All U.S. listed equities (NYSE + NASDAQ + AMEX)? - A specific index universe (e.g., Russell 3000, S&P 1500, etc.)? 2. Weighting & capital allocation • Do you want the 500 names held equal-weighted each day, or capital-weighted by volume or something else? • Should the model reinvest 100% of capital every day (i.e., fully invested, 0% cash)? 3. Entry/exit prices • Buy at the same day’s close and sell at next day’s close? • Or buy next day’s open and sell same day’s close (open-to-close)? 4. Transaction costs • Specify round-trip cost per trade (e.g., 2 bps each side = 0.04% per round trip), or assume zero? 5. Benchmark (optional) • Any benchmark you’d like the results compared to (e.g., SPY)? Once I have these, I can generate the data-retrieval plan and run the strategy back-test.