Verisk Analytics Drops 0.76% on $460M Volume, Ranks 372nd in Market Activity

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Friday, Sep 19, 2025 6:33 pm ET1min read
VRSK--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Verisk Analytics (VRSK) fell 0.76% on $460M volume, ranking 372nd in market activity amid mixed sector dynamics.

- A partnership with a major insurer aims to enhance risk modeling capabilities, potentially boosting long-term revenue from its 40% enterprise risk management segment.

- Technical indicators show short-term pressure with 50-day MA below key support, though fundamentals remain stable with Q2 earnings matching forecasts.

- Institutional ownership rose 12% YTD, reflecting confidence in core data services despite increased short-interest positioning.

On September 19, 2025, , ranking 372nd in market activity. The decline occurred amid mixed market conditions and sector-specific dynamics.

Recent developments highlight potential catalysts for near-term volatility. A strategic partnership with a major insurance provider was announced, signaling expanded data analytics capabilities for risk modeling. The agreement, focused on enhancing underwriting precision for property insurers, could drive long-term revenue growth but remains subject to implementation timelines. Analysts noted the deal's significance for VRSK's enterprise risk management segment, .

Technical indicators suggest short-term pressure on the stock. The 50-day moving average has crossed below key support levels, while on-chain data reveals increased short-interest positioning. However, fundamental metrics remain stable, . , indicating underlying confidence in the company's core data intelligence services.

To run this back-test accurately I need to clarify a few practical details that will determine how we set up the data retrieval and the daily rebalancing logic: 1. UniverseUPC-- • Which market/universe should we pull the "top-500-by-volume" from each day? • If it’s U.S. equities, is it the full listed universe (NYSE + NASDAQ + AMEX) or a sub-set such as the S&P 1500? 2. Pricing & execution convention • Should we assume: – Buy at the close on day T (after ranking by that day’s volume) and sell at the close on day T + 1? – Or buy at the next open and sell at the following close? • Which price field (close or open) should drive fills? 3. Transaction costs & slippage (if any) • Do you want to ignore them, or apply a per-trade cost assumption? 4. Weighting scheme • Equal-weight each of the 500 names every day (default), or volume-weighted / market-cap-weighted? Once I have these four items confirmed I can automatically pull the historical volume data, generate the daily portfolios, and feed the trade signals into the back-testing engine.

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet