Upstart Shares Plummets 1.74 as $280M Volume Ranks 399th Amid Regulatory Scrutiny and Partnership Expansion

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Friday, Oct 3, 2025 6:55 pm ET1min read
ETC--
UPST--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Upstart shares fell 1.74% on October 3, 2025, with $280M volume—29.82% lower than the previous day—ranking 399th in market liquidity.

- Federal regulators demanded additional documentation on Upstart's AI-driven lending models, prompting a board committee to address compliance ahead of Q3 earnings.

- A partnership expansion with regional banks to integrate Upstart's underwriting tools was highlighted as a potential growth catalyst amid fintech sector volatility.

- Market caution persisted due to shifting interest rates and credit risk metrics, despite the strategic developments impacting Upstart's credit technology platform.

On October 3, 2025, UpstartUPST-- (UPST) closed with a 1.74% decline, trading on volume of $280 million—a 29.82% drop from the prior day’s activity—ranking 399th in market liquidity. The move followed a series of strategic developments impacting its credit technology platform and regulatory engagement.

Analysts noted increased scrutiny over the company’s AI-driven lending models as federal regulators requested additional documentation on risk assessment protocols. This came amid broader industry discussions on algorithmic transparency, with Upstart’s board reportedly convening a special committee to address compliance priorities ahead of its Q3 earnings release.

Separately, a partnership expansion with regional banks to integrate Upstart’s underwriting tools into their loan portfolios was highlighted as a potential growth catalyst. However, market participants remained cautious, citing recent volatility in fintech sectors amid shifting interest rate expectations and evolving credit risk metrics.

To run this back-test robustly I need a little more detail: 1. Universe scope – do you want to rank all U.S. listed common stocks each day, or restrict it to a particular index (e.g., S&P 500 constituents, NASDAQ, Russell 3000, etc.)? 2. Portfolio construction – should the 500 names be held in equal weight and re-balanced every trading day (i.e., the entire portfolio is turned over daily)? 3. Transaction costs/slippage – should we include a per-trade cost, or ignore trading frictions? 4. Benchmark – would you like us to compute excess return versus a benchmark index (e.g., SPY) or just report absolute returns? Once I have those clarifications I can lay out the precise data-gathering and back-test steps (including any default assumptions you’re comfortable with) and run the test from 2022-01-01 through today.

Busca aquellos valores cuyo volumen de negociación sea elevado.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet