Before the devastating wildfires engulfed Los Angeles, a series of underlying issues were already casting long shadows over the region's ability to respond and recover.
Budget Cuts Hamstringing Fire Department
A month prior to the fires, LAFD Fire Chief Kristin Crowley sounded the alarm. City budget documents reveal a $17.6 - million (2%) decrease in the fire department's funding from the 2023 - 24 to the 2024 - 25 fiscal year. Despite the city council's November approval of a four - year, $203 - million contract with the firefighter's union, drawn from the general fund to boost staff wages and benefits, the budget cuts were taking a toll.
In a December 4 memo to the Board of Fire Commissioners, Chief Crowley stated that these cuts had adversely affected the Department's ability to maintain core operations. A $7 - million reduction in overtime hours severely restricted the department's capacity for emergency preparedness, training, and response. It also hampered brush clearance and residential inspections. The cuts resulted from eliminating 58 positions, adjusting sworn salary accounts, and removing one - time expenses like new breathing equipment for firefighters.
Mayor Karen Bass, at a press conference, claimed that the cuts did not impact the department's fire - fighting capabilities. However, at the December 17 board meeting, Board President Genethia Hudley - Hayes acknowledged the funding and staffing crisis within the department. The fire department had overspent by an estimated $66.6 million in the 2023 - 24 fiscal year, mainly due to unbudgeted contracts, unused sick time, and overtime. In contrast, the police department's budget increased by $125.9 million (about 7%).
Insurance Crisis Simmering Before the Blazes
Even before the fires, an insurance crisis was brewing in Los Angeles. In July, State Farm, the state's largest insurance company, stopped insuring over a thousand homeowners in the fire - prone Pacific Palisades neighborhood. President Denise Hardin cited the area as too risky, not renewing nearly 70% of policies in the neighborhood's zip code. This left residents more dependent on the state - backed FAIR plan, which covered an area with nearly $5.9 billion in assets at risk of fire.
The current wildfires have now realized the fears of residents, insurers, and regulators. Thousands of homes and businesses in Los Angeles, many in the Palisades, have been destroyed. Experts warn that the financial losses could overwhelm California's already fragile insurance market. Home insurers were starting to feel more optimistic about their future in California with new regulations allowing rate increases and climate - risk - based models in exchange for selling policies in fire - prone areas. But the fires have raised doubts about whether these measures are sufficient.
Moody's Ratings estimates insured losses from the fires to be in the billions, while J.P. Morgan puts it in the tens of billions. Private insurers in California have long been worried about high - cost catastrophes, as legally - allowed premiums did not match escalating fire damage due to climate change. In the past two years, seven of the state's top 12 insurers have scaled back coverage.
The FAIR plan has seen a surge in participation, with premiums typically higher than private insurers. In Pacific Palisades, the number of FAIR plan policies increased 85% from 2023 to 2024. However, the plan's president testified in March that it was overextended, with over $300 billion in potential losses and only $200 million in surplus. If claims from the current fires exceed its reserves, private insurers will cover the first $1 billion shortfall, and if the toll is even higher, policyholders could face premium increases.
Adding to the problem, many homeowners relying on the FAIR plan are underinsured, as the plan caps policies at $3 million, often less than the median home price in fire - prone wealthy communities. This situation highlights the complex balance between homeowners' need for accessible and affordable insurance, insurers' need to accurately price risks, and the long - term impact of climate change on the insurability of properties in California.