United Airlines Shares Drop 1.97% as CEO Condemns ULCC Model $550M Volume Ranks 188th

On September 9, 2025, United Airlines Holdings (UAL) fell 1.97% with a trading volume of $0.55 billion, ranking 188th in market activity. The decline followed comments from CEO Scott Kirby, who criticized the viability of ultra-low-cost carrier (ULCC) models during the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Aerospace Summit. Kirby labeled the ULCC approach an “interesting experiment” that “failed,” directly challenging Spirit Airlines’ business strategy amid its recent bankruptcy filing.

Kirby’s remarks intensified an ongoing public dispute with Spirit Airlines, which has cut operations to 11 U.S. cities to reduce costs. United’s strategic pivot away from low-cost competition aligns with its broader focus on premium services and profitability. Analysts attribute Spirit’s financial struggles to unsustainable operating expenses, which reached $1.2 billion in the latest quarter—118% of its revenue. United’s expansion into markets previously served by Spirit suggests a proactive effort to capture market share amid the rival’s restructuring.

United’s financials highlight a $39.9 billion revenue stream in 2023, with 89.1% from passenger transportation. The company operates a fleet of 945 aircraft, 812 of which are owned. Despite recent price declines, UAL’s forward P/E ratio of 10.38 remains below the industry average, signaling potential valuation appeal. Upcoming earnings are projected to show a 20.42% year-over-year drop in EPS, though analysts expect $15.26 billion in quarterly revenue, reflecting cautious optimism about operational adjustments.

United’s strategy to abandon the ULCC model underscores a shift toward customer-centric premium offerings. Kirby emphasized the need to align with “evolving customer expectations,” a stance that could influence industry dynamics as rivals navigate cost pressures. The airline’s valuation metrics and strategic clarity may attract investors seeking long-term growth, though near-term earnings volatility remains a risk. Analysts note that changes in revenue forecasts could impact short-term stock momentum.

The backtesting framework outlined for evaluating high-volume stock strategies currently lacks the capacity to process dynamic, multi-asset portfolios. While direct simulation of a top-500-by-volume strategy is not feasible, alternative approaches—such as using ETF proxies or static universe testing—can approximate results. The tool’s limitations include real-time ranking of tickers and daily turnover management, but simplified models or external data inputs offer workarounds for assessing cumulative returns. Implementation would require further specification of preferred methods or data sources.