Uncle Sam Wants Lithium: Trump Team Eyes LAC Stake as Sector Explodes

Written byGavin Maguire
Wednesday, Sep 24, 2025 8:40 am ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- U.S. government considers equity stake in Lithium Americas (LAC) via DOE loan renegotiation, aiming to secure domestic lithium supply and reduce China dependence.

- Proposed terms include binding offtake agreements with GM and adjusted loan terms to de-risk Thacker Pass project amid weak lithium prices and competitive pressures.

- This marks a shift toward industrial policy blending equity, offtake, and loans, mirroring precedents like MP Materials, to stabilize U.S. critical mineral supply chains.

- Market reacts positively to policy-driven support, boosting lithium peers as investors re-rate U.S.-tied projects with clearer financing visibility and national security alignment.

Here’s the big idea: Washington is weighing an

in Lithium Americas (LAC) as it renegotiates a $2.26B DOE loan for the Thacker Pass project—potentially up to 10% via no-cost warrants—marking a sharper, more interventionist push to secure critical minerals and reduce dependence on China. The headline sent screaming higher and lifted peers pre-market, but the “why” matters more than the “wow”: this is about national security, assured offtake, and de-risking a flagship U.S. lithium asset in a weak price tape.

Why now, and why equity? First, the DOE is re-evaluating the loan amid worries about low prices and competitive pressure from Chinese supply; tying public capital to an upside stake helps align incentives and justify risk if prices stay choppy. Second, the administration appears to want firmer commercial anchors—namely binding offtake—and has pushed General Motors (already a 38% project owner) to formalize long-dated purchases, making the project financeable through the cycle. In short: equity + offtake + amended loan terms = durable U.S. supply.

There’s also precedent. The government has already shown it will go beyond grants: MP Materials disclosed a package including preferred equity, warrants, a price-protection agreement, and a DoD offtake—an explicit template for mixing industrial policy with return potential. If replicated in lithium, it would be a notable evolution from loans toward true balance-sheet partnership.

What to watch at Thacker Pass: GM’s role and the exact terms. LAC has highlighted GM’s rights to 100% of Phase 1 production for 20 years and 38% of Phase 2 for 20 years (with ROFO on the rest). If the renegotiation tightens those commitments and smooths the amortization profile on the DOE loan, it lowers project risk and increases the odds of first production in the back half of the decade. Translation: less financing overhang, more visibility. (

)

Market read-through: The Reuters scoop triggered a sector pop—Albemarle, SQM, Sigma Lithium, and Standard Lithium all pushed higher pre-market. That’s the “policy beta” at work: when Washington puts real skin in the game, investors quickly re-rate names with U.S.-tied supply or best-in-class assets. Expect this to remain a trading factor as details emerge.

Names to keep on the radar (and why) • Albemarle (ALB): U.S. heavyweight with domestic optionality; obvious beneficiary of any sustained policy floor under U.S. lithium supply chains. (

) • SQM (SQM): Scale, low-cost Chile exposure; benefits from any global price support that U.S. actions might signal. • Sigma Lithium (SGML): High-grade Brazilian hard-rock; leverage to any risk-on in battery materials after policy headlines. • Standard Lithium (SLI): U.S. brine project in Arkansas; a direct play on “made-in-America” supply if loan/equity frameworks expand. ( ) • Piedmont Lithium: North Carolina project with a history of Tesla offtake arrangements; state permitting progress improves line-of-sight to domestic volumes.

Strategic implications (bigger than one stock)

  • From “energy transition” to “security transition”: The reported LAC stake aligns with a broader pivot—funding critical minerals as a national-security imperative, not just a climate goal. Expect more deals that blend loans, equity, and offtake to crowd-in private capital.
  • Offtake is the new subsidy: Mandated or encouraged long-term purchase commitments (GM-style) de-risk projects when spot markets are soft. That could accelerate FIDs across U.S. lithium.
  • Policy beta ≠ price floor: Government involvement can compress financing risk premia, but it won’t repeal commodity cycles. If Chinese supply remains loose, equities will still trade with lithium’s fundamentals—albeit with better downside buffers.
  • Bottom line: A U.S. equity stake in LAC would be a meaningful escalation of industrial policy—signaling Washington is willing to share risk to secure domestic lithium. For investors, the set-up favors U.S.-linked projects and high-quality producers while the market waits for price discipline to return. Track the negotiation specifics (stake size, warrant terms, GM offtake language, loan amortization). If they land “tight,” the re-rating in U.S. lithium could stick rather than fade.

    Comments

    

    Add a public comment...
    No comments

    No comments yet