U.S. Election: Not an 'Uneventful Event' for Global Markets, Says UBS Chief

As the U.S. presidential election between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris approaches, financial markets are abuzz with anticipation. While markets aren't directly predicting a Trump victory, they aren't ignoring the election either. Current narratives suggest that financial indicators are being interpreted as predictors of the election outcome. However, a closer look reveals that these market movements are driven by traditional economic factors rather than political events.


Financial Indicators and Market Interpretation
----------------------------------------------

One of the most notable market movements is the spike in Treasury yields. Some market participants attribute this to expectations of a Trump victory, as his economic policies are perceived to be more inflationary. However, financial experts like Tom Essaye argue that these market movements are primarily driven by traditional economic factors such as growth, inflation, and Federal Reserve policy.

Misinterpretation of Market Moves
---------------------------------

Certain market activities, like the rally in bank stocks and specific stock movements, are incorrectly perceived as election predictions. For instance, the rally in bank stocks is often attributed to the expectation of a Trump victory. However, economic fundamentals and corporate performance, rather than political events, are driving these trends. Bank stocks have benefited from a strong economy and rising interest rates, which boost their profitability.

Bond Market Volatility
-----------------------

Market fear is evident in the surge of the ICE BofAML MOVE Index, a measure of bond market volatility, ahead of the election. This index has reached levels not seen since the 2008 financial crisis, indicating significant market anxiety.


Impact of Election Uncertainty
------------------------------

The broader market fears related to the election uncertainty are palpable. However, historically, the stock market has thrived irrespective of which party controls the White House. The market's resilience is evident in its performance during past election cycles, with the S&P 500 index posting gains in 27 out of the 36 presidential election years since 1928.

Political Influence on Investing
-------------------------------

Investors should avoid letting political biases influence their investment decisions. Past election cycles have shown that incorrect political assumptions can lead to missed financial opportunities. For instance, investors who sold stocks in the lead-up to the 2016 election due to fears of a Trump victory missed out on significant gains.

In conclusion, while the U.S. election may not be an 'uneventful event' for global markets, its impact is likely to be limited. Market movements are primarily driven by traditional economic factors, and investors should focus on fundamental analysis rather than political events. By maintaining a balanced approach that considers both macroeconomic factors and company-specific fundamentals, investors can navigate the election uncertainty and capitalize on long-term investment opportunities.