Trump's USTR Pick: A Pragmatic Approach to Trade Policy

As the Trump administration enters its final year, the nomination of Jamieson Greer as the new U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has sparked interest in the direction of America's trade policy. Greer, a trade lawyer who served as USTR's chief of staff under Robert Lighthizer, has been vocal about his support for a more pragmatic approach to trade, focusing on U.S. competitiveness and job creation. In this article, we will explore Greer's perspective on trade policy and its potential implications for investors.



Greer's pragmatic approach to trade policy differs from the Trump administration's previous strategies, such as the use of tariffs as a primary tool. In his testimony before the House Ways and Means trade subcommittee in 2023, Greer emphasized the importance of restoring the U.S. manufacturing base to ensure national security interests. He stated, "From a defense perspective, it is critically important to restore the U.S. manufacturing base to ensure that the U.S. can credibly deter escalation by China and, if necessary, defend its national security interests at home and abroad" (Greer, 2023).

Greer's focus on the manufacturing sector suggests that he views it as a crucial industry for U.S. economic and national security. He also recommended Congress consider revoking permanent normal trade relations with China, which would deny China the most favorable U.S. tariff rates. This action, if taken, would aim to protect U.S. industries from unfair competition and support domestic manufacturing.

Additionally, Greer called for aggressive enforcement of the Trump administration's trade deal with China, as well as continued use of export controls and sanctions aimed at Beijing. These measures would help protect U.S. industries from Chinese competition and maintain U.S. technological superiority.

Greer's pragmatic approach to trade policy could have significant implications for investors. By focusing on U.S. competitiveness and job creation, Greer's strategy may lead to increased investment in domestic manufacturing and infrastructure. This could result in opportunities for investors in sectors such as industrial machinery, construction materials, and technology.

Moreover, Greer's emphasis on enforcing trade agreements and maintaining export controls could lead to a more stable and predictable trade environment. This could benefit investors in companies that rely on international trade, as they may face fewer disruptions and uncertainties in their supply chains and export markets.

However, it is essential to note that Greer's pragmatic approach may not be without its challenges. Revoking permanent normal trade relations with China could lead to retaliatory measures from Beijing, potentially escalating trade tensions and negatively impacting U.S. companies with significant exposure to the Chinese market. Additionally, aggressive enforcement of trade agreements and export controls could strain relations with other countries, potentially leading to diplomatic and economic repercussions.

In conclusion, Jamieson Greer's nomination as USTR signals a potential shift in the Trump administration's trade policy, focusing on pragmatism, U.S. competitiveness, and job creation. While this approach may present opportunities for investors in domestic manufacturing and infrastructure, it is essential to consider the potential risks and challenges associated with this strategy. As always, investors should conduct thorough research and consider their risk tolerance before making investment decisions.

Word count: 598