Trump on tax bill: Over last 24 hours, think support solidified

Friday, Jun 6, 2025 6:04 pm ET2min read

Trump on tax bill: Over last 24 hours, think support solidified

In the wake of President Trump's withdrawal from the OECD's global minimum tax agreement, support for his administration's tax bill has seemingly solidified over the past 24 hours. The move, which was not unexpected given the administration's long-standing opposition to the OECD's Inclusive Framework, has sparked renewed debate and scrutiny over international tax coordination and U.S. sovereignty.

The OECD's global minimum tax plan, which aimed to establish a 15 percent minimum effective tax rate for multinational corporations, was met with bipartisan concerns in the U.S. Lawmakers, including Republicans, were uneasy with the plan's centralization of taxing powers through opaque and unaccountable mechanisms. The Under-Taxed Profits Rule (UTPR), in particular, posed a direct challenge to national tax sovereignty by allowing foreign governments to impose top-up taxes on income earned in the U.S. if they believed the Americans were not taxing their own companies at the OECD's determined 15 percent rate [1].

President Trump's executive order, issued on his first day back in the Oval Office, instructed government officials to notify the OECD that any commitments made by the prior administration on behalf of the United States with respect to the Global Tax Deal had no force or effect within the U.S. The order also directed the Treasury Department to investigate discriminatory foreign tax regimes, invoking retaliatory action under Section 891 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code [1].

The Trump administration's stance on the OECD global tax deal has been met with support from Republican lawmakers, who have passed legislation to impose retaliatory taxes on individuals and businesses of nations that adopt digital taxes or apply rules on under-taxed profits to U.S. companies. The legislation is currently pending in the Senate [1].

The withdrawal from the OECD deal and the solidification of support for the Trump administration's tax bill come at a time when geopolitical tensions are disrupting international tax alignment. Europe is pushing forward with its consensus directive on Pillar 2 of the OECD's two-pillar framework, which mandates that member states implement the global minimum tax rules. However, support for the plan remains uneven outside of this relatively narrow coalition, with major developing countries and the U.S. expressing skepticism [1].

In addition to the OECD withdrawal, the Trump administration's tax bill has also been met with support over the past 24 hours. The bill, which includes provisions to eliminate federal electric vehicle (EV) tax credits for manufacturers that have already sold over 200,000 qualifying vehicles between 2009 and 2025, has been a contentious issue. Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, has publicly criticized the bill, arguing that it undermines innovation and economic discipline. However, the bill has been backed by GOP lawmakers, who view it as a necessary measure to address the current tax incentives for electric vehicles [2].

The solidification of support for the Trump administration's tax bill and withdrawal from the OECD's global minimum tax deal underscores the ongoing debate over international tax coordination and U.S. sovereignty. As the U.S. and other countries back away from the OECD's tax overreach, the EU is left with its consensus directive on Pillar 2, which requires member states to implement the rules. The paths forward are numerous and uncertain as countries wait to see how the Trump administration and Congress engage with the stalled OECD process [1].

References:
[1] https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/trump-oecd-global-tax/
[2] https://www.livemint.com/news/why-elon-musk-turned-against-donald-trump-and-his-one-big-beautiful-bill-here-are-the-5-reasons-11749051430652.html

Trump on tax bill: Over last 24 hours, think support solidified

Aime Insights

Aime Insights

How might the recent executive share sales at Rimini Street impact investor sentiment towards the company?

How could Nvidia's planned shipment of H200 chips to China in early 2026 affect the global semiconductor market?

How should investors position themselves in the face of a potential market correction?

What is the current sentiment towards safe-haven assets like gold and silver?

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet