Trump Tariffs Slash U.S. Ag Sector Profits 30%

Generated by AI AgentWord on the Street
Monday, May 12, 2025 4:08 am ET2min read

As the first quarter financial reports rolled in, a clear trend emerged among major U.S. agricultural enterprises: the policies implemented by President Trump since the beginning of the year have had a profound impact on the agricultural sector. The disruption in agricultural commodity trading, delays in farmers' tractor purchases, and a decrease in agricultural fertilizer imports are all indicators of the far-reaching effects of Trump's policies, particularly the high tariffs.

The agricultural sector, already grappling with challenges such as adverse weather conditions, high fertilizer prices, low crop prices, and intensified competition from Brazil, is now facing additional hurdles due to the trade policies. The slowdown in global trade, exacerbated by Trump's tariffs, is expected to prolong the sector's struggles, which have persisted for several years. The uncertainty surrounding future incentives from the Trump administration has further heightened concerns about the sector's prospects.

The first quarter financial reports revealed that the agricultural commodity traders and processors have been hit the hardest by the "Trump shock."

Co. and , two major players in the sector, reported a combined decrease of approximately $750 million in operating profits for the first quarter. Both companies cited trade and biofuel policy uncertainties as significant factors impacting their performance.

Anderson Inc., another agricultural commodity trader, reported a decline in trade volumes due to Trump's threat to impose tariffs on Chinese ships docking at U.S. ports. This has led to delays in purchases of U.S. grains and oilseeds by importers. William Krueger, the CEO of

, noted during an investor call that the uncertainty in global trade has disrupted typical grain flows, causing many commercial clients to adopt a "zero inventory" purchasing strategy.

Tractor manufacturers

NV and AGCO Corp. also reported a decline in first-quarter sales and warned of potential decreases in farmer demand for tractors due to the tariff impact. Both companies have raised prices to mitigate the cost effects of the tariffs. Eric Hansotia, the CEO of AGCO, stated during an analyst call that geopolitical uncertainties and trade frictions have recently dampened U.S. farmer confidence, resulting in lower-than-expected demand for agricultural machinery this quarter.

The tariffs are also expected to curb imports of certain fertilizers and pesticides, leading to higher costs for U.S. farmers. Mosaic Co., a major U.S. fertilizer producer, reported lower shipments of phosphate fertilizers into the U.S. as many vessels have been rerouted to other countries to avoid tariffs. Bruce Bodine, the company's CEO, noted that while the tariffs may disrupt trade flows, they do not increase the supply of phosphate fertilizers. Nutrien Ltd., another major fertilizer and pesticide producer, indicated that the cost of its branded products could increase by 7.5%. Jeff Tarsi, the global retail president of Nutrien, stated that the company plans to pass on the price increases to its customers.

While U.S. farmers and agricultural companies grapple with the impacts of Trump's tariffs, Brazil is emerging as a beneficiary of the trade dispute. Minerva SA, a Brazilian beef supplier, reported increased profits due to higher demand and export prices for South American beef driven by the U.S. tariff turmoil. Since Trump first raised tariffs on Chinese goods in 2018, China has shifted a significant portion of its soybean demand to Brazil. Jenny Wang, the commercial executive vice president of Mosaic Co., noted that any adverse effects on U.S. agriculture due to tariffs and trade flow changes could benefit Brazilian agriculture.

Aime Insights

Aime Insights

How could Nvidia's planned shipment of H200 chips to China in early 2026 affect the global semiconductor market?

How should investors position themselves in the face of a potential market correction?

How might the recent executive share sales at Rimini Street impact investor sentiment towards the company?

What is the current sentiment towards safe-haven assets like gold and silver?

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet