Trump's Illegal USPS Takeover: A Threat to Democracy and E-commerce

In a shocking turn of events, major news outlets have reported that President Trump plans an illegal takeover of the United States Postal Service (USPS). This move, if successful, would have severe consequences for democracy, rural communities, and the e-commerce industry. As the American public grapples with this news, it's crucial to understand what's at stake and why we must stand against this greedy, profit-driven action.

APWU President Mark Dimondstein took to the airwaves to shed light on the importance of the USPS and the potential harm of moving it under the Commerce Department. On Inside with Jen Psaki, Dimondstein emphasized that the USPS is a truly democratic service, allowing everyone, regardless of their location or background, to communicate, do business, and even vote. He warned that this takeover is the first step towards dismantling and selling off this cherished national treasure for profit.

On Sunday, Dimondstein joined Rev. Al Sharpton on PoliticsNation to reiterate the essential role of the public Postal Service in the fabric of the country. He highlighted that the USPS is the low-cost anchor of the growing e-commerce industry and a source of good, living wage, union jobs for our communities. Moving to dismantle the Postal Service, Dimondstein argued, is purely a greedy, profit-driven action that would harm rural delivery and drive up prices.

Billionaires like Howard Lutnick and Elon Musk would love to get their hands on the public Postal Service for their own profit. Make no mistake, this illegal attempt at a takeover will be the first step toward shifting control of the post office to private, profit-driven interests. The American people deserve a Postal Service that remains true to its public mission. Watch President Dimondstein’s messages below:

But what exactly is at stake if Trump succeeds in his illegal takeover of the USPS?

Threats to Democracy and Rural Communities

The USPS plays a crucial role in ensuring the integrity of the voting system by providing a reliable and accessible means for citizens to cast their ballots. Privatization could lead to potential disruptions or changes in this critical function, disproportionately impacting rural and low-income communities. A private company may prioritize profitability over accessibility, resulting in reduced services or higher costs for these areas. This could make it more difficult for residents to participate in the voting process, further exacerbating the issue.