Trump Admin Lets Nvidia, AMD Sell AI Chips to China for 15% Revenue Share

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Tuesday, Aug 12, 2025 5:47 am ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Trump administration approved Nvidia/AMD AI chip sales to China with 15% revenue share, marking a pay-for-play export policy shift.

- Bipartisan critics warn the deal risks national security and sets a dangerous precedent for monetizing technology access.

- Legal experts debate the arrangement's constitutionality while analysts fear it could weaken U.S. semiconductor industry competitiveness.

- The 15% fee may reduce profit margins by 5-15% and create uncertainty for future export licensing frameworks.

The Trump administration has approved a controversial deal allowing

and to resume sales of previously banned AI chips to China, in return for the U.S. government receiving 15% of the revenue generated from those sales [1]. This marks a significant shift in export control policy, where access to restricted technology is now directly tied to financial payment [2]. The agreement, announced amid broader discussions with Beijing on rare earth minerals, has triggered bipartisan criticism over its implications for national security and the integrity of export policy [3].

The deal primarily involves the H20 AI chip from Nvidia, a product previously restricted by Washington. Trump’s decision to lift the ban and instead impose a revenue-sharing arrangement has been characterized by critics as a “pay-for-play” model that undermines longstanding export control principles [4]. Lawmakers from both parties have expressed concerns that the move could create a precedent where national security is effectively for sale [5]. John Moolenaar, chair of the House Select Committee on China, warned that such an approach could embolden foreign adversaries and weaken U.S. technological advantage [6]. Similarly, Raja Krishnamoorthi emphasized that the agreement sends a dangerous message that national security can be negotiated for financial gain [7].

The Trump administration has defended the deal by highlighting the H20’s limited strategic value, with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick describing it as a “fourth-best” chip and downplaying its potential impact on U.S. technological dominance [8]. The administration has also indicated openness to allowing a scaled-down version of Nvidia’s Blackwell chips to be exported to China, suggesting a broader trend of negotiating access to restricted technology [9]. However, critics argue that this approach risks enabling China’s AI development and eroding the U.S. position in the global semiconductor industry [10].

Legal experts remain divided on the legality of the revenue-sharing arrangement. The U.S. Constitution prohibits Congress from imposing export taxes, and while the administration has not officially labeled the 15% payment as such, legal scholars like Jeremy Iloulian and Kyle Handley suggest it functions effectively as one [11]. The lack of clarity has raised concerns about the precedent this agreement may set for future export licenses and the potential for similar financial arrangements across other sectors [12].

From a financial perspective, analysts warn that the 15% fee could reduce profit margins for China-bound processors by 5 to 15 percentage points, with Bernstein analysts labeling it a “slippery slope” that may encourage the U.S. to apply similar fees to other critical exports [13]. Hendi Susanto, a portfolio manager at Gabelli, noted that companies now face uncertainty over whether the same model will apply to other strategic goods, calling the payment both a potential burden and a necessary lifeline for maintaining market access in China [14].

The deal reflects a broader shift in Trump’s second administration toward blending economic incentives with trade concessions, a strategy that has drawn mixed reactions. While the agreement provides immediate financial benefits to the U.S. government, its long-term effects on national security and market competitiveness remain unclear. As debates continue, the deal underscores the complex balancing act between economic interests and strategic priorities in U.S. trade policy.

Sources:

[1] US Demands 15% of Nvidia and AMD's China AI Chip ... (https://winbuzzer.com/2025/08/12/us-demands-15-of-nvidia-and-amds-china-ai-chip-revenue-in-unprecedented-deal-xcxwbn/)

[2] MTG enjoyed 142% windfall on company's ICE contract but ... (https://uk.news.yahoo.com/mtg-cashed-ice-contractor-big-150116436.html)

[3] Editorial Roundup: United States (https://wtop.com/national/2025/08/editorial-roundup-united-states-4/)

[4] Trump defends deal to sell Nvidia export control license (https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/2025/08/trump-defends-deal-to-sell-nvidia-export-control-license-00503778)

[5] Editorial Roundup: United States - Yahoo News Canada (https://ca.news.yahoo.com/editorial-roundup-united-states-225046424.html)

[6] Updates: Trump's Foreign-Policy Shifts (https://foreignpolicy.com/projects/trump-presidency-personnel-cabinet-policy-issues/)

[7] Some thoughts on six months of Trump 2.0 - Urbanomics (https://urbanomics.substack.com/p/some-thoughts-on-six-months-of-trump)

[8] Trump draws backlash over Nvidia export control license (https://aspicts.substack.com/p/trump-draws-backlash-over-nvidia)

[9] 'Wild!': CNN Data Chief Says This Trump Story Is 'Quickly ... (https://www.aol.com/wild-cnn-data-chief-says-001903042.html)

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet