Treasury Yields: A Growth-Oriented Investment Thesis

Despite recent turbulence, the current 10-year Treasury yield environment presents a contrarian entry point for growth portfolios. After peaking at 4.33% in late August, the yield stabilized near 4.11% by the end of October, settling below the long-term average of 4.25%. This moderation follows sharp volatility spikes, like the April 2025 tariff-induced surge that pushed the 10-year yield above 4.5%. Critically, the Treasury market's depth remains a structural tailwind. Daily transaction volumes averaging $900 billion validate institutional confidence, ensuring the market continues to function as the global benchmark for risk-free returns and a vital source of liquidity for growth assets. However, this thesis hinges on a key falsifier: the current growth thesis only holds if real yields-a measure sensitive to inflation and Fed policy-spike above the 2.5% threshold. Any sustained breach of this level would fundamentally alter the risk/reward equation for growth investments.

3.5%".

The Federal Reserve's October policy pivot provided a clear catalyst for growth-oriented assets. By cutting its key rate by a quarter-point to a 3.75%-4% range on October 29th and announcing the end of quantitative tightening effective December 1st, the Fed directly pressured short-term yields lower while stabilizing its $6.6 trillion balance sheet. This dual action translated into tangible market moves, with US 10-year Treasury yields dropping roughly 20 basis points in September alone, approaching the psychologically significant 4% threshold. Statistical analysis confirms the Fed's dominant role, showing that changes in its policy rate explain 43% of one-month variations in the US yield curve according to Stambaugh methodology spanning 1964-2025. Current market pricing now reflects expectations for two to three additional rate cuts by year-end, projecting the terminal rate into the 3.8%-3.9% range, driven largely by labor market fragility-negative job revisions, weakening leading indicators, and poor consumer surveys. Quantitatively, history suggests three Fed cuts typically shave just 3-5 basis points off the 10-year yield, while a more aggressive six-cut path could drive it down around 20 basis points globally.

However, the journey wasn't smooth. Fed Chair Jerome Powell's caveat that a December cut wasn't a "foregone conclusion" sparked volatility, causing CME Group's FedWatch tool to slash the probability of an early December move from 90% to 67%. This ambiguity highlights the critical dependence of yield movements on the materialization of cuts and clear forward guidance-without these, the 4% barrier for the 10-year Treasury remains solid. Ultimately, the growth thesis hinges on inflation staying contained; should core PCE unexpectedly breach 3.5%, the Fed's accommodative stance could unravel, collapsing this momentum. For now, though, the policy easing has provided essential tailwinds.

Despite persistent headwinds, the US Treasury market continues to demonstrate underlying structural resilience, with deficits and tariffs paradoxically strengthening demand from core institutional investors. While the proposed $1+ trillion primary deficit and 2025 tariff regime raise valid concerns about long-term demand sustainability, these very challenges are fueling concentrated buying by domestic institutions seeking yield in an environment where currency-hedged US Treasuries still offer relative value against European and Japanese equivalents.

Institutional penetration rates have surprisingly risen despite compressed spread volatility, as major buyers like pension funds and insurance companies absorb increased issuance without significant price pressure. The market's $900 billion daily transaction volume and $4 trillion in daily repo financing underscore its depth, with domestic liquidity providers stepping into roles traditionally filled by foreign investors. This penetration shift appears durable, as foreign holdings remain structurally elevated despite tariff-induced disincentives.

The normalization of the yield curve to a +53 basis point spread further supports resilience, reducing recession anxieties compared to the historically prolonged 16-month inversion that preceded recent economic forecasts. While yield curve inversions have historically predicted 7 of 8 recessions since 1968, the current 32% recession probability index reflects recalibrated expectations rather than imminent crisis. The true test will come if auction discount spreads widen significantly or foreign ownership falls below $1 trillion – scenarios that would fundamentally challenge the market's institutional buying thesis.

The recent stabilization of Treasury yields near 4.1% reflects a pivotal moment for fixed income positioning, yet the path ahead hinges on whether the Federal Reserve's accommodative stance materializes. While the 10-year note flirted with 4% in September, its current proximity to the long-term average of 4.25% suggests room for further decline if policy commitments hold. Our growth-oriented framework prioritizes tactical entry points tied to concrete market signals rather than speculative forecasts.

First, we monitor Fed policy consistency as the primary driver. If the yield dips below 3.9%, it would confirm market pricing of aggressive easing-particularly if accompanied by dovish forward guidance. Such a move has historically preceded broader risk asset rallies, as declining real yields reduce the opportunity cost of equities and credit. Second, institutional buying resilience must be verified: daily Treasury transactions exceeding $900 million would indicate sustained demand from large allocators, validating the substitution demand thesis for fixed income.

October's Treasury auctions offer a critical stress test. Strong demand at the 4.0% coupon would signal that institutional buyers remain active despite high deficits, reinforcing the growth thesis. Conversely, a hawkish shift in Fed guidance before December-particularly if tied to persistent inflation data-would invalidate our base case. For now, the evidence supports cautious accumulation below 3.9%, with allocations scaling incrementally as institutional flows and auction results confirm sustained confidence in the Treasury market's capacity to absorb supply.