Treasury S John Hurley objected to Minnesota crackdown: WaPo

Treasury S John Hurley objected to Minnesota crackdown: WaPo

Treasury Official Resigns Over Objections to Minnesota Immigration Crackdown
A senior Treasury Department official, John Hurley, is set to leave his post after privately opposing a White House-backed initiative targeting alleged fraud within the Somali immigrant community in Minnesota, according to seven sources familiar with the matter. Hurley's resignation highlights growing tensions within the Trump administration over immigration enforcement strategies and interagency coordination.

The crackdown in question is part of a broader surge in immigration raids in Minneapolis, which the Justice Department has accused certain individuals of impeding, citing concerns over potential violence. These operations, which have drawn significant public and political scrutiny, involve collaboration between federal agencies and local law enforcement. However, Hurley reportedly raised objections to the Treasury's role in supporting such efforts, according to sources.

The controversy coincides with other high-profile incidents involving federal immigration enforcement in Minnesota. A government lawyer, Julie Le, was removed from her Justice Department detail after expressing frustration during a court hearing, telling a judge, "this job sucks." While unrelated to Hurley's resignation, the incident underscores the contentious environment surrounding immigration policy implementation in the region.

Hurley's departure adds to ongoing debates about the Trump administration's approach to immigration and its alignment with congressional priorities. Democrats have separately threatened to trigger a government shutdown over policy disputes, though no direct link to Hurley's case has been established. For financial markets, the developments may signal heightened political volatility, potentially affecting investor confidence in policy stability.

The Treasury Department has not publicly commented on Hurley's exit, and the White House has not addressed the specifics of the dispute. As the administration navigates internal divisions, the episode underscores the challenges of balancing enforcement priorities with interagency and public relations concerns.