Tornado Cash Co-Founder's Trial Intensifies as Defense Challenges Key Witness

Generated by AI AgentCoin World
Monday, Jul 21, 2025 6:43 pm ET1min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Roman Storm, co-founder of Tornado Cash, faces U.S. charges of money laundering and sanctions violations, with his defense challenging the credibility of key witness Hanfeng Ling.

- Defense experts argue there's no blockchain evidence supporting Ling's claims, noting scammers rarely use Tornado Cash, while FBI traced $5M+ transactions through the mixer.

- Judge allowed a government expert to testify about a potential "user registry smart contract," a ruling critical to linking Storm to alleged crimes.

- The trial's outcome could set a legal precedent for crypto-related crimes, following another Tornado Cash developer's recent prison sentence in the Netherlands.

- Ongoing legal scrutiny highlights evolving challenges in prosecuting cryptocurrency offenses and the need for clearer regulatory frameworks.

The trial of Roman Storm, co-founder of Tornado Cash, has intensified as his defense team questions the credibility of the government's key witness. Storm is facing charges of conspiracy to launder money and violate U.S. sanctions in a Manhattan federal court. His lawyer, David Patton, has contested the testimony of Hanfeng Ling, who alleged that her stolen cryptocurrency was funneled through Tornado Cash during a 2021 "pig butchering" scam. The defense asserts that there is no blockchain evidence supporting Ling's claim, a position backed by

security expert Taylor Monahan. Monahan noted that scammers generally do not use Tornado Cash, raising questions about the government's investigative approach.

The trial, which commenced last week, has attracted significant attention from the crypto community. Storm, arrested in 2023, could face up to 45 years in prison if found guilty on all counts. He has maintained his innocence. The defense's strategy to discredit Ling's testimony is part of a broader effort to weaken the prosecution's case, which has included testimony from hackers, FBI agents, and financial investigators. FBI special agent Joel DeCapua testified that his team traced 16 large transactions, each exceeding $5 million, through the mixer. However, the defense has questioned the reliability of these findings.

In addition to challenging the key witness, the defense attempted to exclude testimony from a government expert who suggested that Storm could have implemented smart contract features to prevent criminal use of the platform. Judge Katherine Failla rejected this motion, allowing AnChain.AI investigator Philip Werlau to testify that a "user registry smart contract" was technically possible, even if it was never implemented. This ruling is crucial as it permits the prosecution to present evidence that could potentially link Storm to the alleged criminal activities.

The trial is anticipated to continue for another two to three weeks, with the prosecution expected to conclude its case by Friday. The defense's challenges to the government's key witness and expert testimony underscore the complexities of the case and the potential for a mistrial. The outcome of the trial will have far-reaching implications for the crypto community, potentially setting a precedent for future similar cases. This case follows the sentencing of another Tornado Cash developer, Alexey Pertsev, to over five years in prison in the Netherlands earlier this year for similar charges. Judge Failla has indicated that she is reviewing the handling of recent crypto cases in court, suggesting that the legal framework for cryptocurrency-related crimes is still developing.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet