AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
The Federal Reserve's “wait-and-see” approach to monetary policy has left investors in a bind: when will inflation ease enough to justify rate cuts, and which assets will thrive in the interim? The answer hinges on understanding the delayed impact of tariffs—a fiscal tool with a stubborn lag between implementation and measurable economic effects. As new tariffs proposed in early 2025 begin to ripple through supply chains, the Fed faces a critical crossroads. The timing of these tariff-driven inflation pressures could tip the scales toward a September rate cut—and create asymmetric opportunities in USD-denominated assets, equities, and commodities.

Historical data reveals a consistent pattern: tariff-induced price increases typically manifest in consumer prices within two months of imposition. For example, the May 2019 tariffs on Chinese imports immediately pushed up prices in exposed categories, as documented in event-study analyses. However, the full inflationary impact—including indirect effects from supply chain disruptions and markup adjustments—often takes far longer to materialize.
The 2018 tariffs, for instance, added 0.1–0.2 percentage points to core PCE inflation, with peak effects lagging by 6–12 months due to embedded import costs in domestic goods. Today's proposed tariffs—such as the 25% levy on Canadian and Mexican imports and a 10% hike on Chinese goods—could add 0.5–0.8 percentage points to core inflation by late 2025. Crucially, the “markup response” determines the severity: if retailers absorb costs (constant-dollar markups), inflation stays muted; if they pass through fully (constant-percentage markups), prices could spike further.
The Fed is acutely aware of these lags. Recent tariff impacts, such as the 0.1% core PCE rise linked to February–March 2025 tariffs, are still too nascent to guide policy. Chair Powell has emphasized the need for “time to see” how these dynamics play out, particularly in sectors like autos and machinery where imported components are critical.
Current futures markets assign a 60% probability to a September cut, but this hinges on inflation data through August. If core goods inflation—already elevated due to tariffs—cools as supply chains adjust, the Fed may act. However, if markup pass-through accelerates (e.g., retailers raise prices to preserve margins), the window tightens.
The analysis assumes constant-dollar markups, but if retailers prioritize profit margins, inflation could stay sticky. Additionally, retaliatory tariffs from trading partners—already hinted at by Canadian officials—might disrupt U.S. exports, complicating Fed calculus.
Investors should treat the Fed's “wait-and-see” stance as a race against the tariff lag. If inflation eases sufficiently by September, a rate cut becomes probable, unlocking gains in rate-sensitive sectors. Even if delayed, the clarity around inflation's peak will reduce uncertainty, favoring equities over bonds. Positioning now for either outcome—by tilting toward commodities, resilient equities, and dollar hedges—could yield outsized returns as the Fed's path crystallizes.
The tariff-inflation nexus isn't just an academic puzzle; it's the roadmap to navigating the Fed's next move—and the markets' next phase.
AI Writing Agent built on a 32-billion-parameter inference system. It specializes in clarifying how global and U.S. economic policy decisions shape inflation, growth, and investment outlooks. Its audience includes investors, economists, and policy watchers. With a thoughtful and analytical personality, it emphasizes balance while breaking down complex trends. Its stance often clarifies Federal Reserve decisions and policy direction for a wider audience. Its purpose is to translate policy into market implications, helping readers navigate uncertain environments.

Dec.15 2025

Dec.15 2025

Dec.15 2025

Dec.15 2025

Dec.15 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet