Tesla Q2 Earnings: Mixed Results Raise Questions as Musk Doubles Down on Autonomy

Tesla’s second-quarter results underscored a company caught between present-day margin pressures and a futuristic vision driven by autonomy and robotics. The electric vehicle (EV) giant reported revenues of $22.5 billion, narrowly beating consensus estimates, while adjusted EPS of $0.40 came in line. However, declining automotive revenues, falling margins, and tepid free cash flow reinforced concerns about near-term fundamentals—even as CEO Elon Musk projected ambitious expansion of robotaxis and Optimus robots. Tariffs, expiring U.S. tax credits, and intensifying global competition remain formidable headwinds.

WATCH: Bob Elliott: Markets Are Delusional — And Credit Knows it.

Revenue for the quarter declined 16% year over year in Tesla’s automotive segment, falling to $16.7 billion as vehicle deliveries dropped for the second straight quarter. That weakness, combined with a 51% plunge in regulatory credit revenue ($439 million vs. $890 million YoY), drove down overall margins. Tesla posted a 4.1% operating margin—down more than 200 basis points from a year ago—and net income of $1.17 billion. While Tesla cleared the bar on top-line revenue, the underwhelming bottom line kept investors cautious.

Free cash flow for the quarter came in at just $146 million, down sharply from prior periods. Operating cash flow dropped by one-third YoY to $2.54 billion, while CapEx came in at $2.39 billion. The result: a razor-thin free cash flow margin and an annualized yield far below 0.2%. Although Tesla sits on a cash pile of $37 billion, the current pace of investment, combined with softening operating leverage, raises flags for valuation.

Margins were squeezed in part by tariff pressures and looming policy changes. CFO Vaibhav Taneja noted that tariff-related costs rose by $300 million sequentially, with two-thirds of that impact hitting the auto segment. He warned that “we are in an unpredictable environment on the tariff front,” and that additional costs would flow through in coming quarters. Moreover, the expiration of the federal $7,500 EV tax credit under the “One Big Beautiful Bill” at the end of September could weigh further on U.S. deliveries and margins.

Taneja added that “we may not be able to guarantee delivery orders placed in the later part of August and beyond,” due to supply limitations tied to abrupt regulatory changes. Tesla’s energy business also saw a 7% YoY decline in revenue, disappointing investors who viewed it as a key offset to slowing EV growth. However, margins in the segment improved sequentially, and Tesla reported its highest-ever gross profit from energy generation and solar deployments.

Still, Musk remained firmly focused on Tesla’s future. He opened the call by celebrating the launch of Tesla’s first fully autonomous ride-hailing service in Austin: “We’re able to successfully launch robo taxi, so providing our first drives with no one in privacy, both paying customers in Austin.” He added that the service area was expanding rapidly and that Tesla hoped to offer autonomous ridehailing to “probably half the population of the U.S. by the end of the year. That’s at least our goal subject to regulatory approvals.”

He emphasized caution, noting, “We’re gonna go cautiously… but the number of vehicles in operation will increase at a hyperexponential rate.” Musk argued that autonomy was a major selling point already, even under supervised full self-driving (FSD) conditions, particularly for the Model Y, which he said became “the best-selling car in Turkey, Netherlands, Switzerland, and Austria” in June.

International regulatory delays have limited full autonomy rollout in regions like Europe and China. Musk said Tesla was close to approval in the Netherlands, the lead regulator for EU-wide deployment. “It’s quite a—you know… I had no idea that something like EU could exist. Beyond challenges with bureaucracy, but we will get the approvals.”

Musk also took aim at competitors: “It is important to note that Tesla is by far the best in the world at real world AI… Google [Waymo] is not good at real world AI thus far… Tesla is actually much better than Google, by far.” He touted Tesla’s superior inference efficiency and optimization per gigabyte of data. In his words, “Provided we execute very well, I think Tesla has a shot at being the most valuable company in the world.”

The company also reiterated its push toward humanoid robotics with Optimus. Musk noted, “Optimus three is an exquisite design in my opinion and will be… the biggest product ever.” He tied AI developments across Tesla’s products, saying, “The same principles that apply to optimizing AI inference of the car apply to Optimus because they’re both really robots in different forms.”

Despite all the forward-looking optimism, the current reality still shows slowing growth and execution risks. Tesla’s second quarter is the latest in a string of results showing eroding fundamentals—automotive sales are falling, margins are narrowing, and regulatory credit support is fading. Even the company’s own guidance around future launches remains vague and contingent on regulatory hurdles.

In the words of Musk: “The best way to predict the future is to make it happen, and we’re making it happen here with Tesla team.” Whether that vision translates to near-term shareholder returns remains a high-stakes question for one of the market’s most scrutinized companies.