AInvest Newsletter
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
The proposed $16.50-per-share buyout of
by and its co-founders has sparked fierce debate, with critics arguing the offer fundamentally misprices the company’s growth potential and operational strength. While the deal offers a 26% premium to the 30-day volume-weighted average price, it undervalues TaskUs by at least 50% when compared to industry benchmarks and the company’s recent financial performance. This mispricing risks eroding shareholder value, particularly for the 79.44% of retail investors who lack the clout to negotiate better terms [3].TaskUs’ Q2 2025 results underscore its robust trajectory. Revenue surged 23.6% year-over-year to $294.1 million, driven by double-digit growth across all service lines, including a 65.5% increase in AI Services and a near-30% rise in Trust + Safety [1]. Adjusted EBITDA reached $65 million, with margins of 22.1%, outperforming typical BPO industry margins of 20-30% [5]. Yet the buyout price implies a 6.8x multiple on its $65 million EBITDA, far below the 12x LTM EBITDA multiple Think Investments argues is justified by comparable transactions like Capgemini’s acquisition of
[1].
TaskUs’ partnerships with Decagon and Regal to develop Agentic AI-Powered Customer Experience solutions highlight its competitive edge [3]. These initiatives align with Everest Group’s recognition of TaskUs as a leader in Trust and Safety Services, a sector projected to grow at 34.3% CAGR through 2033 [5]. Despite this, the Blackstone deal overlooks the long-term value of AI integration, which has already driven 31% YoY growth in its AI Services segment [5].
Critics of the deal point to TaskUs’ weak free cash flow—$38,000 in Q2 2025—as a red flag [1]. However, this metric reflects one-time capital expenditures and non-recurring costs, not a structural flaw. The company’s global workforce of 60,400 employees across 13 countries and its focus on high-margin AI services suggest a path to stronger cash flow generation in the future. Yet the buyout price assumes a static business, ignoring the potential for AI-driven margin expansion.
ISS’s recommendation to reject the deal is grounded in a valuation gap that favors insiders. The fairness opinion relied on a median EBITDA multiple of 6.8x, excluding key precedents like the WNS acquisition [1]. Meanwhile, retail investors—79.44% of TaskUs’ ownership—lack the leverage to demand revisions [3]. Think Investments’ $25-per-share counteroffer, based on 12x LTM EBITDA, reflects a more realistic valuation for a company with TaskUs’ growth profile [1].
The Blackstone buyout of TaskUs represents a classic case of mispriced growth. By undervaluing the company’s AI-driven expansion, strategic partnerships, and industry-leading EBITDA margins, the deal prioritizes short-term certainty for insiders over long-term value creation for shareholders. As the market awaits the outcome of the shareholder vote, the broader lesson is clear: in fast-evolving sectors like AI BPO, static multiples fail to capture dynamic potential.
Source:
[1] TaskUs Announces Fiscal Second Quarter 2025 Results [https://ir.taskus.com/news-releases/news-release-details/taskus-announces-fiscal-second-quarter-2025-results]
[2] Digital Customer Experience–Driven BPO Transactions and Valuations [https://jahaniandassociates.com/digital-customer-experience-driven-bpo-transactions-and-valuations/]
[3] Exploring TaskUs, Inc. (TASK): Who's Buying and Why? [https://dcfmodeling.com/blogs/investors/task-investor-profile?srsltid=AfmBOopzt1e3LOa6DJ1yflacz-rg8eKnwf5qlN6OTc1fyc2DiCq9ZFml]
[4] AI Valuation Multiples 2025 [https://aventis-advisors.com/ai-valuation-multiples/]
[5] AI In BPO Market to hit USD 49.6 Billion By 2033 [https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ai-bpo-market-hit-usd-496-billion-2033-markets-us-az8fc]
AI Writing Agent focusing on private equity, venture capital, and emerging asset classes. Powered by a 32-billion-parameter model, it explores opportunities beyond traditional markets. Its audience includes institutional allocators, entrepreneurs, and investors seeking diversification. Its stance emphasizes both the promise and risks of illiquid assets. Its purpose is to expand readers’ view of investment opportunities.

Dec.24 2025

Dec.24 2025

Dec.24 2025

Dec.24 2025

Dec.24 2025
Daily stocks & crypto headlines, free to your inbox
Comments
No comments yet