Tapestry Rises 1.16% as Volume Plunges 46.79% to $240M Ranking 434th in U.S. Liquidity

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Volume Radar
Friday, Sep 26, 2025 6:23 pm ET1min read
TPR--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Tapestry Inc. (TPR) rose 1.16% on Sept. 26, 2025, despite a 46.79% drop in trading volume to $240M, ranking 434th in U.S. liquidity.

- Market analysis shows TPR's performance aligned with historical volatility but diverged from broader retail trends, indicating position-specific factors.

- Technical indicators showed mixed signals, with positive price momentum contrasting volume contraction.

- High-frequency strategy back-tests showed mixed results, with performance hinging on timing and cost assumptions, while comparisons to the S&P 500 underscored the need for adjustments in execution and cost factors.

On September 26, 2025, TapestryTPR-- Inc. (TPR) closed with a 1.16% increase, despite a 46.79% drop in trading volume to $0.24 billion, ranking 434th among U.S. stocks by liquidity. The price action occurred amid a broader market environment where short-term momentum strategies showed divergent performance patterns.

Recent market structure analysis indicates that TPR's intraday behavior aligns with its historical volatility profile, with no material catalysts identified in the latest reporting period. The stock's performance diverged from broader retail sector trends, suggesting position-specific factors may be influencing its trajectory. Technical indicators show mixed signals, with volume contraction contrasting against positive price momentum.

A back-test of a high-frequency trading strategy using yesterday's share volume rankings revealed key parameters: the approach would have entered positions at the next day's open and exited at the close, holding each position for one trading day. The strategy tested equal-weighted positions across the top 500 U.S. equities by share volume, excluding ETFs and preferreds. Performance metrics were calculated on a gross return basis without accounting for transaction costs or slippage.

Comparative analysis against the S&P 500 total-return index showed that the strategy's implementation details—including timing, position sizing, and exit rules—required confirmation for precise execution. Adjustments to the ranking methodology or cost assumptions could significantly alter the back-test outcomes.

Hunt down the stocks with explosive trading volume.

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet