Taiwan Considers Lifting Weighting Cap on ETFs as TSMC Surges
Thursday, Feb 20, 2025 9:29 pm ET
Taiwan's financial market is abuzz with discussions surrounding the potential lifting of the weighting cap on exchange-traded funds (ETFs), particularly in light of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSMC)'s recent surge. The rapid growth of the ETF market in Taiwan, coupled with TSMC's impressive performance, has raised concerns about market stability and the potential impact on investors. This article explores the potential implications, regulatory concerns, and possible solutions to ensure a balanced and fair market environment.

Potential Implications
Lifting the weighting cap on ETFs could have several potential implications for Taiwan's financial market stability:
1. Increased Volatility: ETFs can amplify market movements, both up and down. With a higher weighting cap, ETFs could exacerbate price swings in the market, leading to increased volatility. This is particularly relevant given TSMC's recent surge, as ETFs with significant exposure to TSMC could experience more pronounced fluctuations.
2. Concentration Risk: A higher weighting cap could lead to increased concentration of assets in a few large-cap stocks like TSMC. This could result in a more volatile market and higher systemic risk, as the performance of the entire market becomes more tied to the performance of a smaller number of stocks.
3. Potential Bubble Formation: The surge in TSMC's stock price and the increased interest in ETFs with high exposure to TSMC could contribute to a bubble formation. If investors continue to pour money into these ETFs, driven by the expectation of high returns, it could lead to an unsustainable market situation that may eventually correct, causing significant losses for investors.
4. Regulatory Concerns: The rapid growth of the ETF market and the surge in TSMC's stock price have already raised concerns among regulators. Lifting the weighting cap could further intensify these concerns, potentially leading to increased regulatory scrutiny and intervention.
Regulatory Concerns and Solutions
The lifting of the weighting cap on TSMC in the MSCI indexes has raised regulatory concerns, particularly regarding the potential over-concentration of assets in stocks in the underlying indices used by ETFs. To address these concerns and ensure a balanced and fair market environment, the following measures can be taken:
1. Strengthen investor education: The Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) should step up investor education efforts to remind retail investors not to blindly enter and exit the market, so they are able to avoid losses. Many Taiwanese investors who invest in high-dividend ETFs focus only on the high dividend payout but ignore the price risk. By educating investors on the risks associated with ETFs and the importance of diversification, the FSC can help promote more rational investment decisions.
2. Monitor ETF market closely: Regulators should closely monitor the ETF market and its impact on the stock market. The central bank of Taiwan has already warned about the systemic risks associated with the rapid growth of the local ETF market and the potential impact on the stock market. By closely monitoring the ETF market, regulators can identify and address any emerging risks or imbalances.
3. Encourage active management: The FSC has pinned its hopes on investors choosing active ETFs over standard passive ETF strategies. By encouraging the development and adoption of active ETFs, regulators can help promote a more balanced market environment that combines both passive and active investing strategies. This can be achieved by providing incentives for fund houses to launch active ETFs and educating investors on the benefits of active management.
4. Address marketing practices: The FSC should address unscrupulous marketing tactics by fund houses that have led to an exaggerated rush into new high-dividend ETFs. By enforcing appropriate advertising guidelines and penalizing fund houses that engage in inappropriate marketing practices, the FSC can help ensure a fair and transparent market environment.
5. Promote competition among ETF providers: To address the potential fee war in the traditional passive ETF sectors, the FSC should encourage competition among ETF providers. By promoting a competitive environment, the FSC can help ensure that ETF providers offer fair and reasonable fees to investors, which can ultimately benefit the market as a whole.
In conclusion, the potential lifting of the weighting cap on ETFs in Taiwan, particularly in light of TSMC's recent surge, raises several implications and regulatory concerns. To ensure a balanced and fair market environment, regulators should consider implementing measures such as strengthening investor education, closely monitoring the ETF market, encouraging active management, addressing marketing practices, and promoting competition among ETF providers. By doing so, regulators can help mitigate the risks associated with the rapid growth of the ETF market and the potential impact on investors.