Supply Chain Vulnerability in the Automotive Sector: Risk Assessment and Resilience Strategies for Investors

---

The automotive sector's supply chain vulnerabilities have become a defining challenge for investors in 2025, shaped by persistent semiconductor shortages, geopolitical tensions, and the accelerating transition to electric vehicles (EVs). As global automakers grapple with these pressures, understanding the interplay of risk and resilience is critical for assessing long-term investment opportunities and exposures.

Key Risks: From Semiconductors to Geopolitical Tariffs

The semiconductor shortage, which began in 2020, continues to disrupt production, with only marginal improvements expected in 2025. This has forced automakers to reduce output and delay model launches, directly impacting revenue streams. For example, Stellantis reported a 37% year-to-date decline in European sales in 2024, underscoring the fragility of global supply chains, according to a Resilinc report. Compounding this, economic pressures such as high interest rates and rising vehicle costs have dampened consumer demand, particularly for EVs, which face affordability hurdles despite government incentives, the Resilinc report notes.

Material sourcing vulnerabilities further amplify risks. China's dominance in critical inputs-over 80% of rare earths and 50%+ of lithium refining-has created bottlenecks for EV production. A 2025 Resilinc report highlights how automakers are now prioritizing recycling technologies and direct supplier deals to mitigate exposure to China's market concentration. Meanwhile, geopolitical instability has intensified enforcement of compliance frameworks like the U.S. UFLPA, with detentions of auto shipments linked to Chinese inputs surging by 1,600% in 2024, according to the ForvisMazars outlook.

Tariffs are reshaping trade dynamics. European premium brands now face weighted tariff rates rising from 1.7% in May 2024 to 18.2% by May 2025, forcing automakers to recalibrate pricing and sourcing strategies, according to S&P Global analysis. In the U.S., the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) has introduced regulatory uncertainty, altering EV credit eligibility and fuel economy standards, the ForvisMazars outlook observes. These shifts demand agile supply chain strategies, as companies balance compliance costs with operational efficiency.

Resilience Strategies: Diversification, Localization, and Innovation

To counter these risks, automakers are adopting multi-pronged resilience strategies. Diversification of suppliers and materials is a priority. For instance, companies are redesigning products to reduce reliance on cobalt and palladium, while investing in recycling technologies to recover critical minerals from end-of-life vehicles, the Resilinc report finds. Localization is another key trend, with automakers repatriating production lines to reduce geopolitical risks. Nissan's decision to repatriate the Rogue model to the U.S. exemplifies this shift, leveraging domestic capacity to bypass global bottlenecks, as shown in Capgemini research.

Technological innovation is also central to resilience. Smart manufacturing technologies, such as AI-driven inventory management, are enabling tighter control over production cycles. OEMs are moving away from traditional 90-day stock models to more responsive systems, allowing faster adaptation to disruptions, the ForvisMazars outlook notes. Additionally, blockchain and AI-based tools are being deployed to ensure supply chain transparency, particularly in compliance-heavy environments like UFLPA enforcement, as highlighted in a Forbes article.

Investment Implications: Navigating the New Normal

For investors, the automotive sector's resilience hinges on three factors:
1. Supplier Diversification: Companies with diversified supplier networks and access to alternative material sources (e.g., rare earth-free motor technologies) are better positioned to withstand shocks.
2. Regulatory Agility: Firms that proactively adapt to evolving tariffs and compliance frameworks-such as those leveraging nearshoring or investing in domestic resourcing-will likely outperform peers.
3. Technological Adaptation: Investments in smart manufacturing, recycling infrastructure, and AI-driven logistics will determine long-term competitiveness.

However, risks remain. The resurgence of interest in internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles in regions with inadequate EV infrastructure suggests that automakers overcommitted to EV transitions may face stranded assets. Similarly, rising repair costs-exemplified by a 3.1% year-over-year increase in labor rates and a $4,730 total cost of repair (TCOR) in 2024-highlight the need for robust after-sales strategies, the CCC report noted.

Conclusion

The automotive sector's supply chain challenges are far from resolved, but they present opportunities for investors who prioritize resilience. Companies that integrate diversification, localization, and technological innovation into their strategies are likely to emerge stronger. Conversely, those clinging to traditional, globalized models risk being outpaced by more agile competitors. As the industry navigates this inflection point, due diligence on supply chain resilience will remain a cornerstone of sound investment decisions.

---