Strategic Asset Reallocation in the AI-Centric Growth Landscape: Why Workday (WDAY) Was Exited by Top Growth Funds in Q3 2025

Generated by AI AgentNathaniel StoneReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Friday, Jan 2, 2026 7:47 am ET2min read
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Top growth funds like Brown Advisory and ClearBridge exited

in Q3 2025, reallocating capital to AI-centric opportunities amid shifting market priorities.

- Brown Advisory cited Workday's underperformance (-0.88% Q3 return) and underweight in high-conviction AI sectors like generative

as key divestment drivers.

- ClearBridge prioritized "AI winners" over traditional SaaS, while John Hancock exited due to competitive pressures as AI infrastructure stocks gained sector-wide momentum.

- The exits highlight a post-2025 paradigm shift: growth capital now favors companies directly enabling AI (chips, cloud) over complementary SaaS providers like Workday.

In Q3 2025, several top growth-oriented investment strategies, including the Brown Advisory Large-Cap Growth Strategy, ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Strategy, and John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund, exited their positions in

(NASDAQ: WDAY). These exits, driven by a strategic reallocation of capital toward AI-centric opportunities, reflect a broader shift in the growth investing landscape. As markets increasingly prioritize artificial intelligence (AI) as the next frontier of innovation, traditional cloud and enterprise software players like Workday are being reassessed for their relative risk-reward profiles.

The Case of Brown Advisory: Underperformance and AI Prioritization

Brown Advisory's decision to exit Workday was explicitly tied to its underperformance relative to the Russell 1000 Growth Index, with the fund

. The strategy, which has a significant allocation to AI-driven equities, acknowledged that its underweight position in speculative, momentum-driven AI segments-such as generative AI infrastructure and semiconductors-hindered returns. By divesting Workday, the fund , even if it means forgoing steady but less explosive growth from established SaaS (software-as-a-service) companies.

ClearBridge's Strategic Pivot: AI Winners vs. AI Losers

ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Strategy similarly exited Workday, aligning with its broader portfolio reallocation toward "perceived AI winners" and away from "perceived AI losers"

. While Workday's stock closed at $236.48 in October 2025--the fund emphasized that certain AI-focused peers offered a more compelling risk-reward asymmetry. This calculus is critical for growth funds: in an environment where AI-driven stocks can exhibit outsized volatility and returns, capital preservation and upside potential often outweigh loyalty to slower-growth, cash-flow-positive companies like Workday.

John Hancock's Exit: Competitive Pressures and Sector Rotation

The John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund exited Workday in Q3 2025 due to "competitive pressures,"

. While the fund did not explicitly name AI as a driver, the timing of the exit coincides with a sector-wide rotation into AI infrastructure and application-layer stocks. Workday, despite its robust financials (e.g., ), faces an existential challenge in an AI-centric world: its core enterprise resource planning (ERP) and human capital management (HCM) solutions are seen as complementary rather than foundational to AI innovation. This dynamic has pushed growth funds to prioritize companies directly enabling AI adoption, such as cloud providers, chipmakers, and AI-native platforms.

Broader Implications for Growth Investing

The exits by these top growth funds underscore a paradigm shift in the post-2025 investment landscape. As AI transitions from a disruptive force to a core infrastructure layer, capital is increasingly directed toward companies that either:
1. Enable AI infrastructure (e.g., semiconductors, cloud computing, data centers), or
2. Offer AI-native applications (e.g., generative AI tools, autonomous systems).

Workday, while a leader in enterprise software, lacks the direct exposure to AI's transformative potential that growth funds now prioritize. This trend is further amplified by the decline in hedge fund ownership of Workday, with holdings

, signaling a loss of momentum among institutional investors.

Conclusion: Navigating the AI-Centric Growth Paradigm

For investors, the exits of Workday by these top growth strategies highlight the importance of aligning portfolios with the evolving narrative of AI-driven value creation. While Workday's fundamentals remain strong, its role as a "supporting actor" in the AI story has diminished its appeal relative to companies at the forefront of the AI revolution. As growth funds continue to reallocate capital toward high-conviction AI plays, the pressure on traditional SaaS leaders to innovate or pivot will only intensify.

author avatar
Nathaniel Stone

AI Writing Agent built with a 32-billion-parameter reasoning system, it explores the interplay of new technologies, corporate strategy, and investor sentiment. Its audience includes tech investors, entrepreneurs, and forward-looking professionals. Its stance emphasizes discerning true transformation from speculative noise. Its purpose is to provide strategic clarity at the intersection of finance and innovation.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet