One Stop Systems' Supply Chain Confidence and Revenue Split Claims Conflict in 2026 Q2 Call
Date of Call: Aug 5, 2026
Financials Results
- Revenue: $9.3M, up 62.3% YOY
- EPS: $0.01 non-GAAP loss per share, compared to $0.09 loss YOY; $0.29 GAAP loss per share, compared to $0.11 loss YOY
- Gross Margin: 39.1%, down 2.2 percentage points YOY to 41.3%
- Operating Margin: Operating expenses were 54.3% of total revenue, up from 85.5% YOY; adjusted EBITDA loss of $0.3M, improved from a loss of $1.8M YOY

Guidance:
- Full-year 2026 revenue growth guidance increased to 25% to 30% from prior 20% to 25%.
- Full-year gross margins expected to be approximately 40%.
- Expect to generate positive EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA for the full year, inclusive of planned strategic investments.
Business Commentary:
Revenue Growth and Strategic Focus:
- One Stop Systems reported
revenueof$9.3 millionfor Q2 2026,up 62.3%year-over-year. - The growth was driven by increased sales of liquid-cooled servers, short-depth servers for military applications, and compute products for autonomous equipment.
Record Bookings and Customer Expansion:
- The company generated
over $15 millionin new bookings for Q2 2026, leading to a book-to-bill ratio of approximately1.7. - This was attributed to new customer acquisition and expansion within existing customer platforms across defense and commercial markets.
Customer-Funded Development and Future Potential:
- Customer-funded development revenue increased
145%year-over-year to approximately$944,000. - This increase is due to early engagements with customers on next-generation platforms, positioning the company for future production opportunities.
Pipeline Growth and Market Dynamics:
- The company's pipeline continues to expand, with 14 programs having multi-year revenue potential exceeding
$42 million. - This growth is supported by strong market dynamics, including the increasing adoption of AI and sensor fusion workloads at the edge.
Legal Settlement and Financial Outlook:
- One Stop Systems reached a settlement of approximately
$6.25 millionfor a commercial dispute, impacting Q2 2026 results. - Despite this, the company increased its full-year 2026 revenue growth guidance to
25% to 30%, supported by strong bookings and a robust pipeline.
Sentiment Analysis:
Overall Tone: Positive
- Management stated: 'We believe our second quarter performance builds upon the strong start we established in the first quarter and demonstrates the continued success of our multi-year strategic growth plan.' They also noted accelerating YOY growth, record bookings, and an increased revenue outlook.
Q&A:
- Question from Brian Kinsinger (AGP): Can you provide an update on two opportunities for the 360 vision solution at Army Vehicles? Where in the procurement lifecycle are these programs, and when is a reasonable timeline for these competitions?
Response: Both programs are in test and evaluation by the Army; timeline is undefined but OSS is production-ready and prepared to move when the Army makes a definitive solution determination.
- Question from Brian Kinsinger (AGP): As you look at the next 6, 12, 18 months, how should we think about your goals for bookings and what's reasonable to assume?
Response: Bookings may be lumpy quarter-to-quarter, but the pipeline and year-to-date book-to-bill ratio support approximately 30% annual growth, with diversification across customers and programs providing optimism.
- Question from Eric Martinuzzi (Lake Street Capital): Is the expectation here that customer-funded development will be at a similar run rate?
Response: Yes, customer-funded development demand is strong and expected to continue at similar levels in the second half of the year, serving as a forward indicator of future growth.
- Question from Eric Martinuzzi (Lake Street Capital): What's really behind the diversification of your customer base?
Response: Diversification results from strategic pipeline development, market recognition, and product agnosticism across applications, allowing rapid adaptation and momentum from multiple customer sets.
- Question from Eric Martinuzzi (Lake Street Capital): Given the upward revision to your revenue... are you confident that memory, motherboards, and other components are in good shape for FY27?
Response: Strategies used in 2026, including early bookings and inventory builds (e.g., memory ahead of lead times), should help support FY27, though supply chain challenges remain.
- Question from Brian Dobson (Clear Street): What do you think has changed recently about how defense customers are thinking about rugged AI compute?
Response: Increased adoption of AI/ML/sensor fusion in existing and new platforms is driving demand; open system architecture reevaluation and operational tempo are accelerating the need for faster, low-latency edge compute.
- Question from Brian Dobson (Clear Street): How do you see the composition of the pipeline evolving over the next year or two, and could that be a contributor to margin expansion?
Response: Pipeline continues to grow roughly 50-50 commercial/defense, with increasing platform positions that include long-term sustainment, providing greater future visibility and potential for margin improvement.
- Question from Austin Moeller (Canaccord Genuity): Is the projected 50% increase in the shipbuilding budget more beneficial to you... Or is there more opportunity on the Golden Dome and shore range air defense side?
Response: OSS is engaged in both areas; all involve high-end compute needs for sensors and AI/ML, with opportunities in naval architectures and Golden Dome layers where compute is critical.
- Question from Austin Moeller (Canaccord Genuity): When might we start seeing some of the programs... flip to LREF or serial production with higher margins?
Response: Timeline for moving early-stage systems to production is uncertain; however, government contracts typically allow for long-lead purchases in advance, reducing the need for inventory stocking ahead of funding.
Contradiction Point 1
Supply Chain Confidence and Memory Procurement Strategy
Contradiction on ability to procure memory ahead of lead times and confidence in securing supply.
Is there a question for Eric Martinuzzi (Lake Street Capital)? - Eric Martinuzzi (Lake Street Capital)
2026Q2: The company is able to secure memory ahead of quoted lead times to de-risk deliveries. - Mike Knowles(CEO)
Are you confident in the supply chain (memory, motherboards) for FY2027 given the revised revenue and reiterated gross margin? - Eric Martinuzzi (Lake Street Capital)
2026Q2: Long lead times for memory persist, but opportunities exist to procure memory ahead of quoted lead times, which was part of the Q2 inventory increase to de-risk deliveries. - Dan(CFO)
Contradiction Point 2
Pipeline Composition and Long-Term Visibility
Contradiction on whether pipeline includes long-term sustainment contracts for visibility.
Can you provide an update on Clear Street's financial performance? - Brian Dobson (Clear Street)
2026Q2: The pipeline remains roughly 50% commercial, 50% defense. It includes not only new opportunities but also long-term sustainment on existing platforms, providing greater visibility and certainty. - Mike Knowles(CEO)
How do you expect the pipeline's composition to evolve over the next year or two and its impact on margin expansion? - Brian Dobson (Clear Street)
2026Q2: The pipeline continues to grow and remains balanced between commercial and defense opportunities. A positive trend is the inclusion of long-term sustainment elements on current platform wins, providing greater visibility and certainty for future revenue. - Mike Knowles(CEO)
Contradiction Point 3
Revenue and Seasonality Phasing
Contradiction on the expected distribution of 2026 revenue between halves of the year.
What were Brian Kinsinger's questions during AGP's earnings call? - Brian Kinsinger (AGP)
2026Q2: The pipeline supports ~30% annual growth, but quarterly bookings may be lumpy. - Mike Knowles(CEO)
Given two consecutive quarters of $15 million in bookings, what should we expect for bookings goals over the next 6–18 months—consistent or lumpy growth? - Brian Kinstlinger (Alliance Global Partners)
20260318-2025 Q4: The revenue guide assumes roughly 40% of 2026 revenue will be recognized in the first half and 60% in the second half... - Michael Knowles(CEO)
Contradiction Point 4
Production Transition Timeline for Army Programs
Contradiction on the timeline for transitioning Army test programs to production.
Austin Moeller (Canaccord Genuity) - Austin Moeller (Canaccord Genuity)
2026Q2: There is no defined timeline for transitioning Army test programs to LRIP/production... Once a program is identified, the government typically supports long-lead purchases in advance of final contract line items, so advanced inventory stocking is not anticipated. - Michael Knowles(CEO)
When might the Army's R&D programs (e.g., 360 vision) transition to Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) or serial production with higher margins, and will the company pursue advanced procurement of inventory? - Scott Searle (ROTH Capital Partners, LLC)
2026Q1: As systems mature and transition to production, they can create multiyear revenue opportunities. The timeline is tied to the U.S. Army's decisions on their requirements. - Daniel Gabel(CEO)
Discover what executives don't want to reveal in conference calls
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.



Comments
No comments yet