Stock Ranks 308th in U.S. Dollar Turnover as Buybacks and Port Risks Weigh on Momentum

On September 15, 2025, , ranking 308th among U.S. equities by dollar turnover. , reflecting a neutral performance relative to broader market indices. The session saw mixed momentum as institutional buyers balanced short-term volatility, with the stock’s volume-to-average ratio remaining within historical norms.

Recent developments suggest earnings visibility could drive near-term direction. A regulatory filing revealed updated capital allocation strategies, emphasizing shareholder returns through a revised . Analysts noted this aligns with management’s Q2 guidance, which highlighted operational efficiency gains in core logistics segments. However, sector-specific risks persist due to pending labor negotiations at key port facilities, though no immediate disruptions have been reported.

Market participants are awaiting the release of Q3 preliminary data by September 28, which could clarify near-term demand trends. , indicating sustained institutional interest. , signaling reduced despite elevated macroeconomic uncertainty.

To run this back-test accurately I need to pin down a few practical details that the data-retrieval tools rely on: 1. Stock universe • Do you want all U.S. listed common stocks (NYSE + NASDAQ) ranked each day, or a different universe (e.g., S&P 1500, Russell 3000, etc.)? 2. Portfolio weighting • Once the day’s top-500 by volume are identified, should we hold them equally-weighted, or do you prefer volume-weighted / value-weighted? 3. Price used for the P&L calculation • Open-to-close (buy at today’s open, exit at tomorrow’s open) or close-to-close? 4. Any trading-cost assumption to include (e.g., 2 bp per leg)? Let me know your preferences (or confirm that the above default choices—US common stocks, equal-weighted, close-to-close, zero explicit costs—are acceptable) and I’ll start the data pull and back-test.