Stellantis (STLA) Surges 3.10% Amid Technical Breakout Signals, Mixed Momentum
Stellantis (STLA) closed the most recent session with a 3.10% gain, suggesting renewed buyer interest. This upward move coincides with a potential breakout from a consolidation phase, as the price has oscillated between 9.50 and 10.30 over the past year. Key support levels appear to form near 9.50 and 9.30, while resistance clusters at 10.00 and 10.30. A bearish engulfing pattern on September 17 (closing at 9.68) contrasts with a bullish marubozu on September 18 (closing at 9.98), highlighting mixed momentum.
Candlestick Theory
The recent bullish marubozu on September 18 indicates strong conviction in the short-term uptrend. However, the preceding bearish engulfing pattern suggests exhaustion in the downward move. Key support levels at 9.50 and 9.30 are critical for confirming a potential reversal, while resistance at 10.00 and 10.30 may cap near-term gains. A break above 10.30 could target 10.50, aligning with a prior Fibonacci retracement level from the April–May rally.
Moving Average Theory
The 50-day moving average (approximately 9.75) currently sits above the 200-day average (around 9.60), forming a bullish "golden cross" in late July. However, the 100-day MA (9.70) has since converged with the 50-day, creating a potential short-term resistance. The price’s recent retest of the 50-day MA (9.98) suggests buyers are defending the trendline, but a close below 9.70 could trigger a retest of the 200-day MA. Short-term traders may focus on the 9.70–9.90 range for directional bias.
MACD & KDJ Indicators
The MACD histogram has shown positive divergence since late August, with the line crossing above the signal line in early September. This aligns with the recent 3.10% rally but raises caution as the RSI (calculated at 68) approaches overbought territory. The stochastic oscillator (KDJ) indicates overbought conditions (K=85, D=78), suggesting potential for a pullback. A bearish crossover in the KDJ or MACD death cross could trigger short-term selling pressure, though divergence between price and indicators complicates this outlook.
Bollinger Bands
Volatility has expanded since early September, with the price testing the upper band (9.98) on September 18. The bands’ width suggests increased momentum, but a contraction in late August preceded the recent breakout. If the price remains within the bands, the 9.70–9.90 range may persist as a trading channel. A breakout above the 10.00 level could signal a shift in volatility and trend strength.
Volume-Price Relationship
Trading volume spiked on September 18 (18.8 million shares), validating the 3.10% gain. However, volume has trended lower in recent sessions despite the price action, which may indicate waning momentum. A sustained increase in volume on upward moves would reinforce the bullish case, while a divergence (rising price with declining volume) could foreshadow a reversal.
Relative Strength Index (RSI)
The RSI (68) is approaching overbought territory but remains below 70, suggesting caution. A close above 70 would trigger a sell signal, though overbought conditions alone do not guarantee a reversal. The RSI’s 14-day average gain (0.03) and average loss (-0.02) reinforce the recent strength but highlight the need for confirmation via a pullback to 65 or below.
Fibonacci Retracement
Key Fibonacci levels from the April–May rally (13.00 to 9.30) include 38.2% at 10.30 and 61.8% at 9.70. The recent 9.98 close aligns with the 50% retracement level, suggesting a potential consolidation phase. A break above 10.30 could target the 10.50 level, while a drop below 9.70 may test the 9.30–9.50 support cluster.
Backtest Hypothesis
A strategy buying on MACD golden crosses and RSI overbought conditions, and selling on RSI below 70 or MACD death crosses, underperformed the benchmark by -15.00% during the backtest period. While the strategy avoided significant drawdowns (0.00%), its high volatility (15.69%) and negative Sharpe ratio (-0.61) indicate poor risk-adjusted returns. This suggests that overbought RSI signals and MACD crossovers may not be reliable in isolation, particularly in volatile or ranging markets like STLA’s recent pattern. Integrating Fibonacci levels or volume confirmation could improve alignment with the stock’s structural support/resistance dynamics.
If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.
Latest Articles
Stay ahead of the market.
Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments
No comments yet