Stellantis' CEO Compensation: A Pay Structure Out of Sync with Performance?

The recent SEC filings and proxy statements for
have ignited a firestorm of debate over the alignment of executive compensation with corporate performance. Former CEO Carlos Tavares' 2024 compensation package—totaling €23.1 million despite a 70% drop in net profit—exposes a critical disconnect between executive incentives and shareholder value. This misalignment, coupled with the automaker's operational struggles, raises profound questions about governance and the path to recovery. Let's dissect the details and their implications for investors.The Pay Structure: A Triumph of Long-Term Over Short-Term?
Tavares' compensation package was anchored in long-term incentives (LTI), which accounted for €20.5 million of his total payout. These included a €10 million “Transformation Incentive” tied to the 2021 merger with Fiat Chrysler and broader strategic goals like electrification. While such incentives are common in merger scenarios, critics argue they failed to reflect Stellantis' immediate operational failures:
- Sales Declines: Global sales dropped 12% in 2024, with North American deliveries plummeting 20% as dealers grappled with overstocked legacy models like the Dodge Challenger and insufficient new EV offerings.
- Profit Collapse: Net profit fell to €5.5 billion from €18.6 billion in 2023. A €133 million net loss in Q4 2024 underscored the severity of the downturn.
- Stock Performance: Shares lost 34% year-to-date in 2024, hitting a 10-year low, reflecting investor skepticism about Tavares' leadership.
Ask Aime: Can you explain why Stellantis' CEO Carlos Tavares received a hefty €23.1 million compensation package despite a significant 70% drop in net profit?
The Governance Gap: Shareholder Approval Despite Red Flags
Despite these glaring issues, shareholders approved Tavares' compensation with 67% support, a stark contrast to 2022, when 52% opposed his pay. The Remuneration Committee justified the payout by citing LTI metrics tied to “long-term strategic goals,” such as positioning Stellantis as a leader in electric mobility. However, these goals lacked teeth in the face of immediate failures:
- North American Neglect: Tavares' incentives focused on global electrification but ignored the critical U.S. market, where Stellantis lost 1.8 percentage points of market share to rivals like Toyota and Ford. The absence of sales-linked metrics allowed poor regional performance to go unrewarded—or penalized.
- Cost-Cutting Over Innovation: Tavares' focus on slashing costs (e.g., workforce reductions, supplier squeeze) prioritized short-term savings over R&D investments. This led to delayed EV launches and a lack of new models, further eroding competitiveness.
- Proxy Advisor Backlash: AllianzGI and ISS condemned the payout as “excessive,” citing misalignment with performance. ISS noted that the LTI's TSR metric rewarded earlier stock gains, not the 2024 decline.
Shareholder Value at Risk: The Governance Divide
The 350:1 ratio of Tavares' pay to the average worker's salary (€65,993) and the 73% cut to UAW profit-sharing checks have fueled labor unrest. This disparity highlights a broader governance issue: executives are insulated from the pain felt by employees and customers. The result is a company riddled with internal conflicts, from dealers to unions, which will hinder recovery.
Can Stellantis Recover? The CEO Transition and Strategic Shifts
With Tavares gone, Stellantis is under pressure to appoint a CEO who can balance long-term electrification goals with short-term operational fixes. Interim leader John Elkann has vowed to address tariff issues and North American market challenges, but the clock is ticking. Investors should watch for:
- New CEO Criteria: The board's shortlist of five candidates must include leaders with proven turnaround expertise and a focus on aligning incentives with North American sales recovery and EV execution.
- Compensation Overhaul: The next CEO's package should tie pay to metrics like U.S. market share growth, EV production targets, and dealer satisfaction, not just vague strategic goals.
- Labor Relations: Resolving disputes over plant relocations and profit-sharing will be critical to restoring operational stability.
Investment Takeaways: Proceed with Caution
Stellantis' stock has already priced in much of the bad news, trading at a 34% discount to its 2021 peak. However, the governance and compensation flaws suggest deeper structural issues. Investors should:
- Demand Transparency: Push for shareholder votes on CEO pay that include performance hurdles tied to North American sales and EV adoption rates.
- Watch for Turnaround Signs: A new CEO with a track record in automotive turnarounds (e.g., someone from Tesla or Rivian) could signal renewed focus on execution.
- Consider the Macro Risks: U.S. tariffs on imported vehicles and parts loom large. Elkann's warnings about their impact on profitability mean any trade policy shifts could swing valuation.

Final Verdict
Stellantis' compensation structure under Tavares was a case of long-term incentives without long-term vision. While electrification is critical, the board's failure to tie pay to immediate operational metrics like sales or market share created a governance blind spot. For investors, the automaker's prospects hinge on a CEO who can balance ambition with accountability—and a compensation plan that finally aligns with shareholder interests. Until then, proceed with caution.
Comments
No comments yet