Stablecoin Market Cap Could Surpass $2 Trillion By 2030

Coin WorldFriday, Jun 13, 2025 8:11 am ET
2min read

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently shared his perspective on the potential growth of dollar-pegged stablecoins, suggesting that their market capitalization could exceed $2 trillion in the coming years. This projection was made during a Senate hearing, where lawmakers are actively working on new regulations to govern these digital assets. The focus is on ensuring that stablecoins are adequately backed by high-quality assets, which would bolster confidence in their stability and reliability.

Bessent's outlook aligns with industry expectations, as a leading industry group anticipates the stablecoin market cap to surpass $2 trillion. This growth would necessitate backing up to $2 trillion in tokens with US Treasury Bills. Analysts from Citigroup have also predicted that issuers might purchase an additional $1 trillion in these bills by 2030, further supporting the potential for significant expansion in the stablecoin market.

In response to the growing importance of stablecoins, lawmakers have advanced a key amendment to the GENIUS Act. This amendment aims to mandate that stablecoin issuers hold reserves in top-tier assets, ensuring that every dollar-linked token has real backing. The amendment has cleared the way for a final vote, which is expected to take place early next week. Supporters of this change argue that it will enhance confidence in stablecoins by providing a solid foundation of assets to support their value.

Currently, the total stablecoin market is valued at approximately $255 billion, with dollar-pegged coins accounting for roughly $233 billion, or 90% of the market. The top nine dollar-pegged coins, including USDT, USDC, USDe, DAI, USD1, FDUSD, PYUSD, TUSD, and USDD, dominate nearly all stablecoin activity. This concentration highlights the significant role that these coins play in the broader stablecoin ecosystem.

Despite the promising outlook, there are several challenges that regulators and issuers must address. If the GENIUS Act faces delays or modifications, issuers may seek more favorable regulatory environments in other markets. Additionally, the dominance of a few large players could create new systemic risks, similar to the "too big to fail" concerns seen in traditional finance. Technical issues, such as glitches and smart-contract bugs, could also trigger runs on tokens, further complicating the regulatory landscape.

If stablecoins gain traction in cross-border payments and decentralized finance, they could strengthen the US dollar's global position. Every $1 trillion in token issuance backed by Treasury Bills could potentially increase demand for US debt. However, achieving this outcome is not guaranteed and will depend on the successful implementation of regulatory frameworks and the continued innovation in the stablecoin market.

Lawmakers must strike a balance between ensuring the safety of stablecoins and fostering innovation in the sector. Issuers need robust risk management plans, and users must see clear benefits beyond speculative gains. While the stablecoin market is currently small compared to the broader financial system, the shift toward programmable money is accelerating, making it a critical area for regulatory attention and industry development.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet

Disclaimer: The news articles available on this platform are generated in whole or in part by artificial intelligence and may not have been reviewed or fact checked by human editors. While we make reasonable efforts to ensure the quality and accuracy of the content, we make no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the truthfulness, reliability, completeness, or timeliness of any information provided. It is your sole responsibility to independently verify any facts, statements, or claims prior to acting upon them. Ainvest Fintech Inc expressly disclaims all liability for any loss, damage, or harm arising from the use of or reliance on AI-generated content, including but not limited to direct, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages.