Stablecoin Boom Forces Basel to Reckon with Regulatory Rigidity

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byAInvest News Editorial Team
Thursday, Nov 20, 2025 4:09 am ET2min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Global regulators, led by the Basel Committee, face pressure to revise strict 1,250% capital requirements for stablecoins as their role in institutional finance expands.

- The U.S. Fed, Bank of England, and EU reject current rules, citing impracticality, while stablecoins like USDT/USDC now underpin regulated crypto derivatives and yield products.

- Basel chair Erik Thedéen acknowledges the need for a "different approach" to risk-weighting stablecoins, which now enable institutional access to crypto markets via platforms like SGX Derivatives.

- Regulatory divergence highlights tensions between caution and innovation, with euro-pegged stablecoins seen as critical to maintaining global financial influence amid tokenization trends.

Global bank regulators are rethinking their strict capital requirements for cryptocurrencies as the stablecoin market surges, with the Basel Committee facing mounting pressure to recalibrate rules that have largely excluded banks from engaging with digital assets. The committee's current framework, which

, effectively forces banks to hold $1.25 in capital for every $1 of exposure, rendering direct participation in crypto markets impractical for most institutions. This harsh stance, initially designed to mitigate risks from volatile assets like , now faces scrutiny as stablecoins-intended to be pegged to fiat currencies-gain traction as critical infrastructure for cross-border payments and institutional finance .

The Basel Committee's rigid approach has drawn explicit resistance from major economies. The U.S. Federal Reserve and Bank of England have both signaled they will not implement the rules in their current form, with Fed officials calling the capital charges "unrealistic" and "lacking practical grounding"

. Japan and the EU have also diverged, with the latter adopting parts of the framework but omitting provisions targeting permissionless blockchains . The pushback reflects a broader industry shift: stablecoins such as Tether's and Circle's are now integral to institutional-grade products, including yield-generating platforms and derivatives trading .

The rapid expansion of stablecoins has upended earlier assumptions about their risk profile. Erik Thedéen, chair of the Basel Committee, acknowledged in a Financial Times interview that the stablecoin boom has "been fairly dramatic,"

to risk weighting. This reassessment is urgent, as stablecoins now underpin services like SGX Derivatives' newly launched Bitcoin and perpetual futures, which offer institutional investors exposure to crypto markets within a regulated, exchange-cleared framework . Meanwhile, platforms such as Figment and Crypto.com are marketing 15% annualized yield products for institutional clients, signaling growing demand for controlled, predictable returns in the stablecoin space .

Regulators in Europe are also grappling with the implications.

that without proactive support for euro-pegged stablecoins, the continent risks ceding influence in the future of global finance. This aligns with broader efforts by firms like Alibaba and JPMorgan to tokenize fiat currencies for faster cross-border transactions , further underscoring stablecoins' role in modernizing financial infrastructure.

The Basel Committee's 2022 framework, set to take effect in January 2026, is already under revision. Thedéen emphasized the need for "quick analysis" on whether stablecoins-and by extension, permissionless blockchains-should retain the 1,250% risk weight or be reclassified. The outcome will determine whether banks can participate in the next phase of crypto adoption, balancing innovation with systemic risk. For now, the divide between regulatory caution and market momentum remains stark, with the U.S. and UK

.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet