US Spy Chief Gabbard Excluded From Maduro Plan Over Past Views

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, was notably absent from the U.S. military operation that captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. This exclusion marked a significant moment for Gabbard, as she is typically a central figure in intelligence-related decisions within the Trump administration. The operation was conducted without her involvement, a situation described as "highly unusual" for the DNI not to be involved in any of these operations, especially something like Venezuela.

The Trump administration has occasionally questioned the necessity of the DNI role, with some arguing it should be abolished. Gabbard's exclusion highlights this skepticism and underscores the administration's preference for a more direct line of command, often bypassing institutional structures. This has been a recurring issue in the Trump administration, which has exhibited occasional unease with Gabbard since she became the top U.S. spy.

Gabbard's exclusion from the Maduro operation was not an isolated incident. In the past, similar operations have seen the DNI left out temporarily while the CIA director or another intelligence figure took the lead. This pattern is not new and has been observed under previous administrations, including those of Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

Why Did This Happen?

Gabbard's exclusion from the Maduro plan was reportedly influenced by past disagreements, particularly an incident last summer when Trump became irritated with a video she posted on social media warning that the world is closer to nuclear war than ever. This post aired just over a week before Trump ordered a strike on Iran, leading to tension within the administration.

The exclusion also reflects a broader administration strategy of limiting the role of the DNI, especially in high-stakes operations. Marc Gustafson, director of analysis at Eurasia Group, noted that it is not unprecedented for directors to be left out of such planning. This has been a recurring practice under various administrations, with the CIA director often taking the lead in such matters.

What Are Analysts Watching Next?

The exclusion of Gabbard from the Maduro operation has sparked discussions about the Trump administration's approach to intelligence coordination. Some analysts believe this signals a shift toward a more streamlined and direct command structure, bypassing traditional bureaucratic layers. This move could affect how intelligence operations are conducted in the future, potentially leading to more centralized control.

Investors and market observers are monitoring how this dynamic might influence national security policies and the broader geopolitical landscape. The administration's actions in Venezuela, particularly the military operation that led to Maduro's capture, have raised questions about the U.S. strategy in the region. Analysts are also watching for any further exclusions of Gabbard from high-profile operations, as this could indicate a long-term shift in the administration's approach to intelligence coordination.