Sprinklr's Q2 2026: Contradictions Emerge on Churn, Hybrid Pricing, Engagement, New Logos, and Bend in Challenges

Generated by AI AgentAinvest Earnings Call Digest
Wednesday, Sep 3, 2025 12:42 pm ET3min read
CXM--
Aime RobotAime Summary

- Sprinklr reported 8% YOY revenue growth ($212M) with record 18% non-GAAP operating margin, but faces ongoing customer churn and downsell pressures.

- The company completed cost restructuring, launched Project BearHug for top 700 customers, and invested in AI features driving higher cloud costs (-3% PS margin).

- Q3 guidance shows 4% YOY revenue growth ($209-210M) with margin pressure from AI/cloud costs, while FY26 targets $746-748M subscription revenue and 16% operating margin.

- Management emphasized hybrid pricing, enterprise expansion (149 $1M+ customers), and AI R&D to achieve Rule of 40, with expected improvement in H2 FY26 to FY27.

The above is the analysis of the conflicting points in this earnings call

Date of Call: None provided

Financials Results

  • Revenue: $212.0M total revenue, up 8% YOY; subscription revenue $188.5M, up 6% YOY
  • EPS: $0.13 non-GAAP per diluted share
  • Gross Margin: 69% non-GAAP; subscription 78% and professional services861016-- ~0%; pressured by higher data/hosting costs
  • Operating Margin: 18% non-GAAP (record $38.2M operating income)

Guidance:

  • Q3 total revenue $209–$210M (~4% YOY); subscription $186–$187M (~3% YOY); professional services ~$23M (+15% YOY); PS gross margin ~-3%.
  • Q3 billings ~$150M; non-GAAP operating income $28.5–$29.5M (~14% margin); non-GAAP EPS ~$0.09 on 257M diluted shares.
  • FY26 subscription revenue $746–$748M (~4% YOY); total revenue $837–$839M (~5% YOY).
  • FY26 non-GAAP operating income $131–$133M (~16% margin); non-GAAP EPS $0.42–$0.43 on 266M shares; other income ~$22M; tax provision ~$40M (~26% rate).
  • FY26 FCF ~$125M; Q3 FCF slightly negative; PS revenue ~$23M in both Q3 and Q4.
  • Higher AI-related cloud/hosting costs and increased investments in AI, R&D, GTM, and implementation.

Business Commentary:

* Revenue Growth Challenges: - SprinklrCXM-- reported second quarter total revenue of $212 million, up 8% year over year, while subscription revenue rose 6% year over year to $188.5 million. - The growth was impacted by continuing customer churn and downsell pressures, which have been affecting Sprinklr for over two years.

  • Transformation and Customer Engagement:
  • Sprinklr has completed the first phase of its transformation, focusing on business optimization and cost restructuring.
  • The company is focusing on improving customer satisfaction and reducing churn through initiatives like Project BearHug, which targets top 700 customers.

  • Investment in AI and Product Enhancements:

  • Sprinklr is investing in AI capabilities, with significant uptake in AI product usage, leading to higher cloud costs in the second half of the year.
  • The investment includes enhancements in AI features, new channel capabilities, and expanded technical skills to improve customer engagement.

  • Leadership Changes:

  • Sprinklr announced the hiring of Bit Rambusch and Scott Millar as the Head of Global Services and Support and Chief Revenue Officer, respectively.
  • These additions reflect a strategic focus on enhancing customer experience and driving revenue growth.

Sentiment Analysis:

  • Management reported 8% YOY revenue growth to $212M and record non-GAAP operating income (18% margin), raised FY26 outlook. However, they flagged continued renewal pressure and churn, guided Q3 revenue to $209–$210M (~4% YOY) with lower margins due to higher AI-driven cloud costs, and emphasized ongoing transformation and cleanup of challenged accounts.

Q&A:

  • Question from Willow Miller (William Blair): When will the business 'bend' and which metrics should we watch?
    Response: Expect the bend in H2 FY26 into early FY27; watch renewals, customer satisfaction, count of challenged accounts, and overall growth.

  • Question from Patrick Walravens (Citizens JMP): Give an example of churn issues and what’s being done.
    Response: Past inconsistent execution led to downsells and overbought ELAs; Project BearHug deepens C‑suite engagement and fixes implementations, converting many to longer renewals.

  • Question from Patrick Walravens (Citizens JMP): Are higher AI costs from LLM token/hosting consumption?
    Response: Yes—strong uptake of Agentic AI and copilot features is driving LLM and hosting costs; AI is embedded in workflows, and guidance remains prudent.

  • Question from Elizabeth Porter (Morgan Stanley): How to reconcile decelerating back-half guide with Q2 progress?
    Response: Guidance is intentionally prudent; Q3 step-down reflects cleanup of challenged accounts, with improvement expected into Q4 and early FY27.

  • Question from Elizabeth Porter (Morgan Stanley): What unlocks CCaaS demand—product or GTM/support?
    Response: Focus in H2 FY26 is hardening large implementations, support, security, and features; plan to accelerate CCaaS growth in FY27 once hardened.

  • Question from Matt Dembley (Cantor Fitzgerald): How will the new hybrid pricing (seats + consumption) affect revenue/profitability?
    Response: Simplified bundles with seat plus token-based consumption for core new logos (ratable subscription) aim to boost transparency, adoption, and upsell; expand to CCaaS next year.

  • Question from Parker Lane (Stifel): How many of the top-700 have troubled engagements, and how are margins trending with higher cloud costs?
    Response: Challenged accounts peaked in May/June and are now in the teens; expect a 2–3 point gross-margin reduction in H2 from AI/cloud consumption.

  • Question from Chris Lynch (Barclays): Timing to move beyond challenged renewals?
    Response: Multi-year renewals are improving, but durable change comes from daily, deeper engagement to expand use cases; bend expected 3Q/4Q into next year.

  • Question from Jackson Ader (KeyBanc Capital Markets): What’s happening with net-new logos?
    Response: FY26 mix intentionally ~25% new/75% expansion to reduce execution risk; focus on Global 2000 enterprises; plan to increase new-logo mix in FY27.

  • Question from Clark Wright (D.A. Davidson): Where is churn concentrated, and thoughts on buybacks?
    Response: Churn is mainly downsell and skewed to mid/low-end; enterprise cohort is growing (149 $1M+ customers). Buybacks considered, but priority is growth and selective tuck-ins.

  • Question from Andrew King (Rosenblatt Securities): Build/partner/M&A priorities and balancing growth vs margin?
    Response: Build-first via R&D; consider tuck-ins/acqui-hires in AI, social, CCaaS. Investing now to accelerate FY27 growth while maintaining margin progress toward Rule of 40.

Discover what executives don't want to reveal in conference calls

Latest Articles

Stay ahead of the market.

Get curated U.S. market news, insights and key dates delivered to your inbox.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet