Spring Art Holdings' Deteriorating ROCE and Earnings: Can the Company Reclaim Profitability?

The financial trajectory of Spring Art Holdings Berhad (KLSE:SPRING) has become a case study in volatility and underperformance. Over the past five years, the company's return on capital employed (ROCE) has plummeted from 27% to a meager 1.7% as of June 2023, a stark contrast to the 11% industry average in the Consumer Durables sector. This decline, coupled with inconsistent earnings and opaque capital deployment strategies, raises critical questions about the company's ability to reverse its fortunes and restore investor confidence.

A Freefall in ROCE and Earnings

Spring Art's ROCE collapse reflects a systemic failure to generate returns on invested capital. While ROCE is a key metric for assessing operational efficiency, the company's performance has deteriorated sharply, with its 2025 ROE of 3.81% further underscoring inefficiencies in shareholder value creation. This trend is compounded by erratic earnings. For instance, earnings per share (EPS) fell from RM0.044 in 2019 to RM0.016 in 2020, then to RM0.013 in 2021 according to financial data. A brief rebound in 2024-EPS rose to RM0.022-was followed by a Q3 2025 loss of RM0.004 per share, compared to a RM0.001 loss in the same period in 2024.

The volatility is exacerbated by non-recurring items distorting financials. A RM4.2 million tax benefit in 2025 inflated statutory profits, masking underlying operational weaknesses. Such accounting anomalies erode trust, as investors struggle to discern sustainable earnings from one-off gains.

Capital Deployment Under Scrutiny

Spring Art's capital allocation strategies have also drawn criticism. Despite a proposed higher dividend for 2025, the company's earnings have not consistently justified such payouts.

Revenue contraction in 2024-down 11.84% year-over-year according to market analysis-highlights challenges in scaling operations or adapting to market shifts. The company's reliance on debt or equity financing to fund operations, without commensurate returns, suggests a misalignment between capital structure and profitability goals.

Can Spring Art Turn the Tide?

The path to recovery hinges on two critical factors: operational restructuring and strategic reinvestment. First, the company must address its declining ROCE by optimizing cost structures and improving asset utilization. For example, reducing overheads or divesting non-core assets could free up capital for higher-return projects. Second, Spring Art needs to demonstrate disciplined capital deployment. This includes prioritizing projects with clear ROI, avoiding over-leveraging, and aligning dividends with sustainable earnings.

However, the absence of detailed strategic plans in recent disclosures raises concerns. Without transparent communication about how management intends to address these issues, skepticism will persist. Investors may also demand stronger governance to ensure accountability, particularly given the company's history of earnings volatility.

Conclusion

Spring Art Holdings' financial struggles are emblematic of a company in need of a comprehensive turnaround. While a rebound in 2024 offered a glimmer of hope, the subsequent Q3 2025 loss and weak ROCE metrics suggest that structural challenges remain. For the company to regain investor confidence, it must deliver on tangible improvements in profitability, capital efficiency, and strategic clarity. Until then, the outlook remains cautiously pessimistic.