South Korea's Stablecoin Deadline: Banks' Control or Fintech Freedom?

Generated by AI AgentCoin WorldReviewed byDavid Feng
Monday, Dec 1, 2025 7:18 pm ET1min read
Speaker 1
Speaker 2
AI Podcast:Your News, Now Playing
Aime RobotAime Summary

- South Korean lawmakers set a Dec 10 deadline for regulators to submit a stablecoin bill, threatening independent action if missed.

- Core debate centers on whether

must control 51% of stablecoin issuers (Bank of Korea) or allow broader fintech participation (FSC).

- Global trends include U.S. Fed's regulatory efforts and Sony Bank's stablecoin partnership, highlighting cross-border integration challenges.

- Deadline urgency grows amid AML crackdowns and competing bills, risking 2026 delays unless compromise or unilateral action resolves the stalemate.

South Korean lawmakers have imposed a December 10 deadline for financial regulators to submit a draft stablecoin bill, signaling escalating pressure to resolve prolonged disputes over the role of banks in stablecoin issuance.

, the ruling Democratic Party issued a "last-minute notice" to regulators, warning that independent legislative action would follow if the deadline is missed. Kang Joon-hyun, a key lawmaker, emphasized that the bill could be fast-tracked for review in an extraordinary National Assembly session in January 2026 if delivered on time . The Financial Services Commission (FSC) acknowledged ongoing discussions but clarified that no final decision has been made on whether banks must hold a majority stake in stablecoin issuers .

The core debate centers on balancing financial stability with innovation.

for banks to control at least 51% of stablecoin issuers, citing risks to monetary policy and anti-money laundering (AML) compliance. Conversely, for a more inclusive model to foster fintech participation and innovation. This divide has on a regulatory framework, with three competing bills under review in the National Assembly's Political Affairs Committee. The bills differ on issues like whether stablecoin issuers should offer interest on holdings, reflecting broader policy divergences .

The urgency of the December 10 deadline is amplified by parallel regulatory developments.

on sub-$680 crypto transfers and new travel rule measures add pressure to finalize stablecoin oversight. Meanwhile, to fintech entry contrasts with the BOK's caution, creating a regulatory tug-of-war that risks delaying a framework into 2026.

Globally, stablecoin developments highlight cross-border implications.

efforts to establish capital and diversification rules for stablecoin issuers under the Genius Act. Separately, to launch a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin initiative, underscoring enterprise adoption trends. These moves illustrate the growing integration of stablecoins into traditional financial systems, even as regulatory clarity remains fragmented.

South Korea's stablecoin

reflects a broader tension between preserving financial stability and embracing digital innovation. With in South Korea reaching 56.95 trillion won in early 2025, the government faces mounting demand for a framework that balances oversight with market growth. The December 10 deadline could force a resolution, either through compromise or unilateral legislative action, shaping the trajectory of KRW-pegged stablecoins and their role in the global crypto ecosystem.

Comments



Add a public comment...
No comments

No comments yet